X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org
Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F184BD9C7E
	for <pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Mon, 10 Oct 2005 11:38:00 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 59826-09
	for <pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Mon, 10 Oct 2005 14:37:56 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from tigger.fuhr.org (tigger.fuhr.org [63.214.45.158])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 243ECD9C62
	for <pgsql-www@postgresql.org>; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 11:37:58 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from winnie.fuhr.org (winnie.fuhr.org [10.1.0.1])
	by tigger.fuhr.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j9AEc1vM081997
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK);
	Mon, 10 Oct 2005 08:38:03 -0600 (MDT)
	(envelope-from mfuhr@winnie.fuhr.org)
Received: from winnie.fuhr.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by winnie.fuhr.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j9AEc0WD098735;
	Mon, 10 Oct 2005 08:38:00 -0600 (MDT)
	(envelope-from mfuhr@winnie.fuhr.org)
Received: (from mfuhr@localhost)
	by winnie.fuhr.org (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j9AEc0lf098734;
	Mon, 10 Oct 2005 08:38:00 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from mfuhr)
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 08:38:00 -0600
From: Michael Fuhr <mike@fuhr.org>
To: Greg Sabino Mullane <greg@turnstep.com>
Cc: pgsql-www@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: User survey suggestion: add CVS as a choice
Message-ID: <20051010143800.GA98669@winnie.fuhr.org>
References: <20051010062456.GA93237@winnie.fuhr.org>
	<71e8a4bfed503880393b15820a7456bd@biglumber.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <71e8a4bfed503880393b15820a7456bd@biglumber.com>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.006 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.006]
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 200510/30
X-Sequence-Number: 8618

On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 02:24:35PM -0000, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
> > Regarding the user survey "Where did you get your current production
> > copy of PostgreSQL from?" I'd like to suggest adding CVS as a choice.
> 
> Yikes! Perhaps you overlooked the all-important "production" word of
> the question? :) Unless you are using cvs with specifically tagged releases.

No, I didn't overlook the word "production," although I anticipated
that somebody might think so.  CVS doesn't necessarily imply HEAD:
I was indeed thinking of people who track tagged releases.

> In either case, I think the handful of people who use cvs rule it out
> as an answer, IMO.

Is CVS usage really that low?  I don't know, not having seen any
activity logs.

-- 
Michael Fuhr