X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EA28DB320 for ; Mon, 31 Oct 2005 12:11:19 -0400 (AST) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 44068-06 for ; Mon, 31 Oct 2005 16:11:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from eastrmmtao01.cox.net (eastrmmtao01.cox.net [68.230.240.38]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E9D3DB237 for ; Mon, 31 Oct 2005 12:11:13 -0400 (AST) Received: from [192.168.0.17] (really [24.170.195.108]) by eastrmmtao01.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with ESMTP id <20051031161039.YGLM13165.eastrmmtao01.cox.net@[192.168.0.17]>; Mon, 31 Oct 2005 11:10:39 -0500 From: Robert Treat To: Claire McLister Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Map of Postgresql Users (OT) Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 11:11:00 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 Cc: pgsql-www@postgresql.org, Brent Wood , MAPSERVER-USERS@LISTS.UMN.EDU, postgis-users@postgis.refractions.net, freegis-list@intevation.de References: <7def66b8e277ec3dcfb0e90f001194fa@zeesource.net> <200510262102.27259.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200510311111.01241.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.004 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.004] X-Spam-Score: 0.004 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200510/120 X-Sequence-Number: 8708 Actually all of the mirrors (at least the official ones) work from the same url (www.postgresql.org), so in theory they should all be able to work from the same key. I've yet to test this theory, but I do think it would work. Robert Treat On Thursday 27 October 2005 13:21, Claire McLister wrote: > Good point. This might actually be a problem. Google Maps API requires > each server that is serving the map to be registered with Google, and > send the corresponding key when making the Javascript request. > > Unless the mirrors can each send their own keys, this will not work. > > Claire > > On Oct 26, 2005, at 6:02 PM, Robert Treat wrote: > > On Wednesday 26 October 2005 18:24, Claire McLister wrote: > >> On Oct 26, 2005, at 2:08 PM, Brent Wood wrote: > >>> There has recently been a thread on the Postgres user list about a > >>> web > >>> based postgres user/developer map. Claire has built a Google map > >>> based > >>> system, getting locations from IP addresses. > >> > >> Just so people know, this map can be found at: > >> > >> http://www.zeesource.net/maps/map.do?group=456 > > > > I'm going to loop in a few more people here :-), namely the pg web > > team who > > will probably be able to give pointers on site integration. One thing > > to keep > > in mind is that the postgresql website is statically mirrored onto a > > number > > of different servers, so any solution we come up with will ideally > > allow > > itself to that. I believe a google maps system can do this (we can > > mirror the > > javascript code and the location/data file on all mirrors and the > > google map > > will work with it as is), which is why I originally went with that > > type of > > solution. > > > > -- > > Robert Treat > > Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL -- Robert Treat Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL