public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Marc G. Fournier <[email protected]>
To: Neil Conway <[email protected]>
Cc: Michael Glaesemann <[email protected]>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <[email protected]>
Cc: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Cc: Dave Page <[email protected]>
Cc: PostgreSQL WWW Mailing List <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: On-line docs for PG 8.1 need updating
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 16:50:42 -0400 (AST)
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
On Mon, 7 Nov 2005, Neil Conway wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 11:03 +0900, Michael Glaesemann wrote:
>> I agree with your points. One reservation I have is that people might
>> be more likely to run a beta in a production environment. Nowadays it
>> seems increasingly common for projects to release betas for
>> widespread circulation. I don't know if this is something that should
>> be encouraged for PostgreSQL. I'd hate to see people get a bad
>> impression of PostgreSQL because a beta screws up their data.
>
> IMHO it is fairly clearly a good thing to get more publicity for
> Postgres betas. That is the whole point of the beta program in the first
> place: I don't see that putting more beta information on the main
> website is fundamentally different from sending email announcing betas
> to -announce, for example. Provided that the caveats are clear, I think
> there's a lot to be gained by publicizing betas more effectively.
As long as it is appropriate tagged as being beta (and clearly), I tend to
agree ... the more ppl we can encourage to test/pound a beta, the better
the end release is ...
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: [email protected] Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
view thread (8+ messages)
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: On-line docs for PG 8.1 need updating
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox