X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 512919DCCD0; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 23:58:33 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 15840-09; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 23:58:35 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from eastrmmtao04.cox.net (eastrmmtao04.cox.net [68.230.240.35]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E44329DCC4C; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 23:58:29 -0400 (AST) Received: from [192.168.0.17] (really [68.105.164.226]) by eastrmmtao04.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with ESMTP id <20051130035635.JSNT4997.eastrmmtao04.cox.net@[192.168.0.17]>; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 22:56:35 -0500 From: Robert Treat To: pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org, pgsql-www@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Please let us know if you will come to the PostgreSQL Anniversary Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 22:58:34 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 Cc: Alvaro Herrera , Josh Berkus References: <200511291804.55160.josh@agliodbs.com> <20051130023050.GH32663@surnet.cl> In-Reply-To: <20051130023050.GH32663@surnet.cl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200511292258.34025.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.017 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.017] X-Spam-Score: 0.017 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200511/196 X-Sequence-Number: 8911 On Tuesday 29 November 2005 21:30, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Josh Berkus wrote: > > So, please fill out the survey at: > > http://thepostgresqlfoundation.org/survey/ > > ... as soon as you can. Thanks! > > What's with the domain-for-each-purpose thing? We could have subdomains > instead, say foundation.postgresql.org and planet.postgresql.org. I > guess I don't understand if there is a reason not to do it that way. It > seems much more coherent to me. > The original reason behind this site having a seperate domain was due primarily to a legal focus. However it used to be that foundation.postgresql.org used to point to it. > What's more, it surprises me that http://foundation.postgresql.org > points to the old advocacy site ... This is probably due to some changes to the apache configs that have been made lately? It should really be fixed. -- Robert Treat Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL