X-Original-To: pgsql-advocacy-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C269D9DCCAC for ; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 22:30:21 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 09602-05 for ; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 22:30:23 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from mx2.surnet.cl (mx2.surnet.cl [216.155.73.181]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B20069DCC4C for ; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 22:30:18 -0400 (AST) Received: from unknown (HELO cluster.surnet.cl) ([216.155.73.165]) by mx2.surnet.cl with ESMTP; 29 Nov 2005 23:31:11 -0300 Received: from alvh.no-ip.org (200.85.216.27) by cluster.surnet.cl (7.0.043) (authenticated as alvherre@surnet.cl) id 435015970062D07E; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 23:30:22 -0300 Received: by alvh.no-ip.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B5901C42069; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 23:30:50 -0300 (CLST) Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 23:30:50 -0300 From: Alvaro Herrera To: Josh Berkus Cc: pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Please let us know if you will come to the PostgreSQL Anniversary Message-ID: <20051130023050.GH32663@surnet.cl> Mail-Followup-To: Josh Berkus , pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org References: <200511291804.55160.josh@agliodbs.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200511291804.55160.josh@agliodbs.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.542 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.527, DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE=0.479, DNS_FROM_RFC_POST=1.44, RCVD_IN_NJABL_PROXY=0.327, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SOCKS=1.823] X-Spam-Score: 3.542 X-Spam-Level: *** X-Archive-Number: 200511/144 X-Sequence-Number: 8148 Josh Berkus wrote: > So, please fill out the survey at: > http://thepostgresqlfoundation.org/survey/ > ... as soon as you can. Thanks! What's with the domain-for-each-purpose thing? We could have subdomains instead, say foundation.postgresql.org and planet.postgresql.org. I guess I don't understand if there is a reason not to do it that way. It seems much more coherent to me. What's more, it surprises me that http://foundation.postgresql.org points to the old advocacy site ... -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support