X-Original-To: pgsql-patches-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4289B9DD5F5 for ; Thu, 1 Dec 2005 09:35:55 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 86323-04 for ; Thu, 1 Dec 2005 09:35:50 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from mx2.surnet.cl (mx2.surnet.cl [216.155.73.181]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAFB89DD44A for ; Thu, 1 Dec 2005 09:35:51 -0400 (AST) Received: from unknown (HELO cluster.surnet.cl) ([216.155.73.165]) by mx2.surnet.cl with ESMTP; 01 Dec 2005 10:35:14 -0300 X-IronPort-AV: i="3.99,200,1131332400"; d="scan'208"; a="974313:sNHT200742576" Received: from alvh.no-ip.org (201.220.122.225) by cluster.surnet.cl (7.0.043) (authenticated as alvherre@surnet.cl) id 438E66E80000DC9B; Thu, 1 Dec 2005 10:35:55 -0300 Received: by alvh.no-ip.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 954E3C26452; Thu, 1 Dec 2005 10:36:29 -0300 (CLST) Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 10:36:29 -0300 From: Alvaro Herrera To: Tom Lane , Patches Subject: Re: aclchk.c refactor Message-ID: <20051201133629.GA31881@surnet.cl> Mail-Followup-To: Tom Lane , Patches References: <20051118195430.GA26861@surnet.cl> <13652.1132361944@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20051119225514.GA16420@surnet.cl> <20051121133308.GB11527@surnet.cl> <20051121151652.GA12273@surnet.cl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051121151652.GA12273@surnet.cl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.954 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.035, DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE=0.479, DNS_FROM_RFC_POST=1.44] X-Spam-Score: 1.954 X-Spam-Level: * X-Archive-Number: 200512/3 X-Sequence-Number: 17962 Alvaro Herrera wrote: > I intend to apply later today the attached patch in order to reduce some > code duplication in aclchk.c and clean a bit the API I just introduced > in the previous patch. This reduces aclchk.c from 2377 lines to 2206. I applied this patch yesterday, but I did not receive the commit message. However I do see it in the online archives. Is there something fishy going on here, or just the mail was lost on its way here? -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support