Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 14:07:16 -0300
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
To: Dave Page <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Marc Fournier <scrappy@hub.org>,
	pgsql-www@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] aclchk.c refactor
Message-ID: <20051201170716.GB31881@surnet.cl>
References: 
 <E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4E7E5A6@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: 
 <E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4E7E5A6@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11

Dave Page wrote:

> > Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
> > > I applied this patch yesterday, but I did not receive the commit
> > > message.  However I do see it in the online archives.
> > 
> > > Is there something fishy going on here, or just the mail 
> > was lost on its
> > > way here?
> > 
> > [ checks mail logs... ]  Hm, I never got a copy of this either:
> > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2005-11/msg00609.php
> > 
> > There's definitely something flaky about pgsql-committers since the
> > server move.  I still haven't seen anything about Michael's 
> > ecpg commits
> > of yesterday, either.
> 
> Mail from there probably comes from tgl@postgresql.org now rather than
> tgl@svr1.postgresql.org from what Marc told me yesterday. I suspect
> Majordomo needs to be told that.

Yeah -- however, I added my alvherre@postgresql.org address as an alias
of my subscribed address, so mail coming from it should pass without
requiring moderator approval.

However, Tom's mail seems to pass through right away.

-- 
Alvaro Herrera                 http://www.amazon.com/gp/registry/DXLWNGRJD34J
"Uno puede defenderse de los ataques; contra los elogios se esta indefenso"