public inbox for [email protected]  

help / color / mirror / Atom feed

From: Josh Berkus <[email protected]>
To: Robert Treat <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Launching PostgreSQL KB Project Mark 2
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2005 12:53:31 -0800
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1133555891.4491.337.camel@camel>
References: <[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>
	<1133555891.4491.337.camel@camel>

Robert,

> Well that's confrontational...

Well, personally I would have thought it would be obvious why we wouldn't 
want corporate supporters participating on this list, but you demanded to 
know.

> Let me put it this way, I have an interest in discussing how the kb will
> be integrated into the main websites, but not much interest in
> discussing how exactly its coded up. That said, it sounds like what you
> need to know first is how it will be integrated into the site, and that
> discussion should probably happen here first *before* you go about
> coding something up and have yourselves painted into a corner.

Actually, I see it as:
1) Functionality Requirements (other list)
2) Requirments Related to Integration (this list)

> They can't read the archives? You can't bullet-point it for them?

To be more clear: Techdocs is not a Knowledge Base.  The previous tread 
discussed re-implementing Techdocs, not a creating a KB,  therefore it is 
not applicable except in a few details where there's overlap.

> Which is why I am confused. Should we discuss the requirements here
> *first*, and then those interested in coding them up can join the
> project and discuss the details there?

Integration requirements, yes.  Functional requirements, no.  The 
functional requirements should be defined by the people who are actually 
going to develop and/or fund the software.

> To do otherwise would seem to add 
> an a priori condition that we're going to use geviks kb project as our
> solution before we even have the requirements.

Per my previous e-mail, that's undecided.   Please read it again and stop 
jumping to conclusions. 

-- 
--Josh

Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

view thread (44+ messages)  latest in thread

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: [email protected]
  Cc: [email protected], [email protected]
  Subject: Re: Launching PostgreSQL KB Project Mark 2
  In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox