X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F2929DC864 for ; Fri, 6 Jan 2006 18:14:10 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 10168-09 for ; Fri, 6 Jan 2006 18:14:11 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from eastrmmtao04.cox.net (eastrmmtao04.cox.net [68.230.240.35]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C77919DC87C for ; Fri, 6 Jan 2006 18:14:07 -0400 (AST) Received: from [192.168.0.17] (really [24.136.39.213]) by eastrmmtao04.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with ESMTP id <20060106221103.YTBQ19943.eastrmmtao04.cox.net@[192.168.0.17]>; Fri, 6 Jan 2006 17:11:03 -0500 From: Robert Treat To: pgsql-www@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Release Announcement News Item -- please read Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 17:14:06 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 Cc: Bruce Momjian , Magnus Hagander , josh@agliodbs.com References: <200601062203.k06M3Bd21906@candle.pha.pa.us> In-Reply-To: <200601062203.k06M3Bd21906@candle.pha.pa.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200601061714.07560.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.105 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.105] X-Spam-Score: 0.105 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200601/20 X-Sequence-Number: 9208 On Friday 06 January 2006 17:03, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Magnus Hagander wrote: > > > WWW Folks, > > > > > > The release announcement news item has been posted to wwwmaster. > > > > > > Please DO NOT APPROVE THIS until Marc gives the thumbs-up, > > > which will probably be Monday AM EST. > > > > > > In the meantime, I'd appreciate it if someone checked my > > > formatting and links. Thanks! > > > > Looks good to me. One question though - is "patch release" the normal > > term for these? I thought we used to call them "minor versions"? > > > > I could well be wrong on this :-) But if "patch release" is what we call > > them, I know at least one page I wrote recently (the security one) needs > > updating, so it'd be good to know. > We've always referred to our versioning scheme as major.minor.revision, but... > Thanks. We are discussing it now. I guess we'll see what they come up with. -- Robert Treat Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL