X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 271C69DC888 for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 18:37:32 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 60248-07 for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 18:37:31 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from mail2.dbitech.ca (radius.wavefire.com [64.141.13.252]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3AA9B9DC838 for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 18:37:26 -0400 (AST) Received: (qmail 20202 invoked from network); 17 Jan 2006 01:16:38 -0000 Received: from dbitech.internal.wavefire.ca (64.141.15.12) by radius.wavefire.com with SMTP; 17 Jan 2006 01:16:38 -0000 From: Darcy Buskermolen Organization: Wavefire Technologies Corp To: "Gavin M. Roy" Subject: Re: [Gforge-admins] PgFoundry Move Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 14:39:58 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 Cc: "Magnus Hagander" , gforge-admins@pgfoundry.org, "Joshua D. Drake" , pgsql-www@postgresql.org References: <6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCE92E9D4@algol.sollentuna.se> <62399B0B-6A7E-45B6-9DE3-F586D66E0EE8@ehpg.net> In-Reply-To: <62399B0B-6A7E-45B6-9DE3-F586D66E0EE8@ehpg.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200601161440.00023.darcy@wavefire.com> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.028 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.028] X-Spam-Score: 0.028 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200601/199 X-Sequence-Number: 9387 On Monday 16 January 2006 14:33, Gavin M. Roy wrote: > On Jan 16, 2006, at 2:25 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote: > >> 80% of the Gforge admins are Linux guys afaik, which is why > >> we need more FreeBSD help. > > > > You're probably going to see that split for anything where you compare > > linux with freebsd today, aren't you? Or at least on average. > > I agree with that. > > > Yes, backup is definitly more important than failover. But failover is > > nice :-) > > But in reality, do we have it? As in failover that works in > > practice as > > well. Just look at what happened when there was an attempt to move > > svr2 > > (wwwmaster) off unionfs to a new VM *on the same machine*. > > It's very good in principle. I'm sure in a lot of cases it works in > > practice as well. I'm concerned it doesn't always, and that we are > > very > > relying on certain people to make it work in that case. > > Failover is nice, but I don't agree that VM's are the best wait to > handle fail over. > > > I'd say trivial. Just poll the ppl who'd be expected to admin it for > > preferences, and decide on one. Then stick with it as much as you can > > > > :-) There is absolutely no need to do a general poll of the whol > > > > community, since that's definitly going to give you more than you want > > > > :-) > > Yeah I just meant on GForge Admins or the current list of community > server admins. > > > Everything else does not run FreeBSD. All www.postgresql.org servers > > except borg (there are 5 in total, IIRC) run Linux today. AFAIK, > > archives and search also run on linux. (And on a mix of distros, which > > is probably not ideal) > > Except borg? wow. And here I am a linux guy donating the only FBSD > box. ;-) if it makes you feel better ca3 is a FreeBSD box :-) Which reminds me there is something bogus with the checker for mirror freshness, because it says I'm behind by a "long" interval yet I picked up all the point releases before the announcement hit the lists... > > Gavin -- Darcy Buskermolen Wavefire Technologies Corp. http://www.wavefire.com ph: 250.717.0200 fx: 250.763.1759