X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 767219DC84E; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 17:37:36 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 40187-08; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 17:37:34 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from eastrmmtao02.cox.net (eastrmmtao02.cox.net [68.230.240.37]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FA959DC854; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 17:37:29 -0400 (AST) Received: from [192.168.0.17] (really [24.136.39.213]) by eastrmmtao02.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with ESMTP id <20060116213733.UJFO14821.eastrmmtao02.cox.net@[192.168.0.17]>; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 16:37:33 -0500 From: Robert Treat To: pgsql-www@postgresql.org Subject: Re: PgFoundry Move Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 16:37:28 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 Cc: "Marc G. Fournier" , David Fetter , "Joshua D. Drake" , gforge-admins@pgfoundry.org References: <43CBE53E.5090106@commandprompt.com> <20060116202147.GC14577@fetter.org> <20060116162903.R28752@ganymede.hub.org> In-Reply-To: <20060116162903.R28752@ganymede.hub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200601161637.28716.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.108 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.108] X-Spam-Score: 0.108 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200601/151 X-Sequence-Number: 9339 On Monday 16 January 2006 15:33, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > On Mon, 16 Jan 2006, David Fetter wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 02:59:29PM -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > >> Not sure where this email came from, but JoshB has gone to the > >> trouble of setting up a new server for pgFoundry, and when that is > >> ready, it will be moved there ... > >> > >> Is there a problem that I haven't been informed of with the server > >> it is currently running on? > > > > There are several problems, but I'll stick to the systemic one that > > such a move can address. Right now, there is exactly one very > > hard-working person, Sean Chittenden, who can put his hands on the > > hardware when needed. This is a fragile situation, and it's already > > cost months of effort because Sean can't put the pgFoundry machine's > > welfare ahead of everything else in his life. > > > > Command Prompt has people on call 24/7, and Josh Drake has mentioned > > to me that their absolute worst situation so far resulted in four > > hours of downtime. > > If its a matter of time on Sean's part, can we ship the server up to > Joshua to put onto their network? > > My one criteria in all of this, from day one, was that it had to be > FreeBSD based, it has to be redundant with our current *core* > infrastructure ... as JoshB has stated in the past, he's sunk personal > money into the server *for* pgFoundry, so just 'ditching' that server, > IMHO, seems to be a no-op ... > based on my interaction with the foundry admins, afaict the single thing stopping us from getting pgfoundry onto a new server is that we're trying to do it on bsd (reread fetters' email for a good synopisis of this). At what point do we decide moving forward is more important than the os we are putting it on? -- Robert Treat Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL