From: Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>
To: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: PgFoundry Move
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 18:36:37 -0500
User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2
Cc: pgsql-www@postgresql.org,
 gforge-admins@pgfoundry.org
References: <43CBE53E.5090106@commandprompt.com>
	<200601161637.28716.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>
	<20060116174447.S28752@ganymede.hub.org>
In-Reply-To: <20060116174447.S28752@ganymede.hub.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200601161836.37704.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>

On Monday 16 January 2006 16:48, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jan 2006, Robert Treat wrote:
> > based on my interaction with the foundry admins, afaict the single thing
> > stopping us from getting pgfoundry onto a new server is that we're
> > trying to do it on bsd (reread fetters' email for a good synopisis of
> > this).  At what point do we decide moving forward is more important than
> > the os we are putting it on?
>
> Never, 

we never decide that moving forward is more important than the os... that 
explains some things.... 

> cause the longer it takes to move it, the less requirement there is 
> to move it as I bring on better/more powerful servers *shrug*
>
> Within the next month or so, we'll have a new 64bit server going online,
> which I'll be able to move pgfoundry over to that has faster drives and
> more memory *shrug*
>

So if we procrastinate^h^h^hcan just hold out for another 2 months we can be 
completely up and running with gforge on a quality dedicated bsd machine?  
Cause I think we can be up and running in month on a linux box...  now i dont 
have anything against bsd so if you only need one extra month I'm happy with 
that, but if you come back in three and say you need two more... 

-- 
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL