X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9E6B9DC894; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 20:25:05 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 79116-02; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 20:25:03 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from noel.decibel.org (noel.decibel.org [67.100.216.10]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AB1D9DC881; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 20:24:55 -0400 (AST) Received: by noel.decibel.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 31A8639830; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 18:24:59 -0600 (CST) Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 18:24:59 -0600 From: "Jim C. Nasby" To: "Joshua D. Drake" Cc: David Fetter , "Marc G. Fournier" , gforge-admins@pgfoundry.org, pgsql-www@postgresql.org Subject: Re: PgFoundry Move Message-ID: <20060117002459.GS67693@pervasive.com> References: <43CBE53E.5090106@commandprompt.com> <20060116145602.C28752@ganymede.hub.org> <20060116202147.GC14577@fetter.org> <20060117000207.GQ67693@pervasive.com> <43CC36BF.6050409@commandprompt.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43CC36BF.6050409@commandprompt.com> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE amd64 X-Distributed: Join the Effort! http://www.distributed.net User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.093 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.093] X-Spam-Score: 0.093 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200601/185 X-Sequence-Number: 9373 On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 04:13:51PM -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > > >I'm not sure why going with CMD means this has to be on linux. > Because we are a Linux shop it has nothing to do with FBSD > as much as it has everything to do with Linux. As I said earlier > I can run FBSD, I prefer Linux. > > Having one OS in the facility greatly decreases costs in maintenance, > administration etc.. and allows us to keep up to date on important > things easier. Sure, but the flip-side is that there really shouldn't be any need for anyone on-site to need to touch the OS itself. For example, distributed.net has run boxes all over the place for years and I think we've only twice needed human intervention at the console due to software, and that was only because we didn't have a hardware-based serial console. Of course I'm sure you guys have a bunch of OS and application level monitoring you can do if it's on linux, but if the folks who are running this stuff would rather roll that themselves I have no problem with that. Ultimately, everyone's motivation in OSS is different; if the folks running pgFoundry enjoy doing so because it's on FBSD that's fine with me, so long as stuff is working well. -- Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby@pervasive.com Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117 vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461