X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D7539DC81C; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 20:52:17 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 83391-04; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 20:52:20 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from candle.pha.pa.us (candle.pha.pa.us [70.90.9.53]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CF049DC847; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 20:52:12 -0400 (AST) Received: (from pgman@localhost) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.11.6) id k0H0qGh07879; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 19:52:16 -0500 (EST) From: Bruce Momjian Message-Id: <200601170052.k0H0qGh07879@candle.pha.pa.us> Subject: Re: pgsql-committers shouldn't be the default "developers" In-Reply-To: <17122.1137438665@sss.pgh.pa.us> To: Tom Lane Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 19:52:16 -0500 (EST) CC: "Marc G. Fournier" , Dave Page , pgsql-www@postgresql.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL121 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.12 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.120] X-Spam-Score: 0.12 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200601/193 X-Sequence-Number: 9381 Tom Lane wrote: > "Marc G. Fournier" writes: > > As someone else suggested, do we want to set Reply-To on that list as > > well, to redirect discussions to -hackers? > > I don't think we should try to force that to happen. A fair part of the > followup threads in -committers aren't really very interesting and need > not go to -hackers. Another problem with adding Reply-To is that by > default a copy will *not* go personally to the particular committer, > which is something that you usually do want to happen when commenting > on a commit. > > (BTW, have we yet got things fixed so that all the addresses that appear > as "From:" for committers actually work to forward mail to the > respective person? Last I checked it seemed not to work for me or > Bruce, but that was awhile ago.) It does work for me now, and probably for you too. :-) All email to @postgresql.org addresses go into this email system: http://webmail.postgresql.org/imp/login.php I used to have a .forward file in my shell home directory so all email went to my pgman@candle.pha.pa.us address, but when I started getting a lot of spam from momjian@postgresql.org, I removed the .forward file, so I was unsure where my email was going. When Josh Berkus wanted to use the momjian@postgreql.org address for press contacts, I had to get it working again. I logged into that web account and had +99% spams. Since Marc has added procmail spam tags, I have now re-added my .forward file, and use the procmail tags Marc adds to help my system learn about spam before discarding the email. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073