X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E4889DC86A; Tue, 17 Jan 2006 06:58:49 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 91514-01; Tue, 17 Jan 2006 06:58:50 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from foggy.rox.net (foggy.rox.net [213.214.0.41]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 967369DC879; Tue, 17 Jan 2006 06:58:46 -0400 (AST) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by foggy.rox.net with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1EyoY4-0006iK-Oj; Tue, 17 Jan 2006 11:58:48 +0100 Received: from [87.223.172.248] (helo=mcknight.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de) by foggy.rox.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1EyoY3-0006hk-OF; Tue, 17 Jan 2006 11:58:48 +0100 Received: by mcknight.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A01644681B0; Tue, 17 Jan 2006 11:58:45 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 11:58:45 +0100 From: Joachim Wieland To: Tom Lane Cc: Bruce Momjian , pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, jgardner@jonathangardner.net, PostgreSQL www Subject: Re: [HACKERS] source documentation tool doxygen Message-ID: <20060117105845.GB2672@mcknight.de> References: <200601162332.k0GNW7D28523@candle.pha.pa.us> <24498.1137474902@sss.pgh.pa.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <24498.1137474902@sss.pgh.pa.us> X-Operating-System: Linux 2.6.13.4 on an i686 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Scanned-By: rockenstein AG X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.103 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.103] X-Spam-Score: 0.103 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200601/203 X-Sequence-Number: 9391 On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 12:15:02AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > The thing seems to have only the very vaguest grasp on whether it is > parsing C or C++ ... or should I say that it is convinced it is parsing > C++ despite all evidence to the contrary? I'd be happier with the > pretty pictures if they had some connection to reality. True. Doxygen is developped for documenting C++ source code. There is however an option OPTIMIZE_OUTPUT_FOR_C which is set. There are a few mor= e options for class and collaboration graphs as well as a switch to create = a graphical class hierarchy, all of them are turned on at the moment. So it might get more concise but we'll have to play around with it to see what = is useful and what isn't. Joachim --=20 Joachim Wieland joe@mcknight= .de C/ Usandizaga 12 1=B0B ICQ: 372= 25940 20002 Donostia / San Sebastian (Spain) GPG key availa= ble