X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86F709DC9AE; Tue, 17 Jan 2006 19:46:30 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 67285-09; Tue, 17 Jan 2006 19:46:32 -0400 (AST) Received: from svr4.postgresql.org (svr4.postgresql.org [66.98.251.159]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 246EC9DC841; Tue, 17 Jan 2006 19:46:28 -0400 (AST) Received: from noel.decibel.org (noel.decibel.org [67.100.216.10]) by svr4.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B05CA5AF06A; Tue, 17 Jan 2006 23:46:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: by noel.decibel.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id D8CDA39820; Tue, 17 Jan 2006 17:46:29 -0600 (CST) Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 17:46:29 -0600 From: "Jim C. Nasby" To: Tom Lane Cc: "Marc G. Fournier" , pgsql-www@postgresql.org Subject: Re: pgsql-committers shouldn't be the default "developers" list Message-ID: <20060117234629.GL17896@decibel.org> References: <9811.1137433999@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20060116150320.U28752@ganymede.hub.org> <17122.1137438665@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20060116151717.N28752@ganymede.hub.org> <17388.1137440193@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20060116155450.N28752@ganymede.hub.org> <24141.1137472287@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20060117003636.N28752@ganymede.hub.org> <24297.1137473403@sss.pgh.pa.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <24297.1137473403@sss.pgh.pa.us> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE amd64 X-Distributed: Join the Effort! http://www.distributed.net User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.094 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.094] X-Spam-Score: 0.094 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200601/215 X-Sequence-Number: 9403 On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 11:50:03PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > "Marc G. Fournier" writes: > > On Mon, 16 Jan 2006, Tom Lane wrote: > >> Cleaned out ... egad, what a lot of spam :-( > > > Almost 3 years worth ... not bad, actually ... 500 per year, less then 2 > > per day ... :) > > Yeah ... the truly depressing thought is what an un-filtered mailbox > must look like these days :-( For Nov. '05, 6645 emails scored at 5 or higher in SpamAssassin, out of 20944 total. That compares with about 2800 emails to -hackers and -general. For Dec. '05, 6723 spams out of 20186 (~2500 -hackers and -general). That's relying soley on SpamAssassin to flag spams, btw. Luckily on only gat about 10 spams a day leaking through, although I do send anything scoring >= 3 and < 5 to a 'probabably spam' folder, which helps quite a bit (I don't really consider those as 'leaking through'). > I'm about ready to engage in vigilante action against spammers, myself. Need any help moving bodies? ;) -- Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby@pervasive.com Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117 vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461