From: Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>
To: "Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby@pervasive.com>
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Is Sourcewear defunct?
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2006 17:19:29 -0500
User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3
Cc: Dave Page <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>, Bruce Raup <brauplists@gmail.com>,
	pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org, pgsql-www@postgresql.org
References: 
 <E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E40103E4B1@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk>
	<20060301193535.GO82012@pervasive.com>
In-Reply-To: <20060301193535.GO82012@pervasive.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200603011719.30141.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>

On Wednesday 01 March 2006 14:35, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 01:59:04PM -0000, Dave Page wrote:
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: pgsql-www-owner@postgresql.org
> > > [mailto:pgsql-www-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Robert Treat
> > > Sent: 28 February 2006 13:54
> > > To: Bruce Raup
> > > Cc: pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org; pgsql-www@postgresql.org
> > > Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] [pgsql-advocacy] Is Sourcewear defunct?
> > >
> > >
> > > This is the second report I've seen of recent purchases going
> > > unfulfilled and customers being unable to get in contact with anyone
> > > from the company. I'm inclined to remove the link from the home page
> > > unless we get someone from the company to address these issues.
> >
> > Yes - we definitely don't want to be linking to a company claiming to
> > support us that don't deliver the goods they take money for. It's not
> > fair to the people that don't get their shirts etc, nor does it paint us
> > in a good light.
>
> Yeah... while we should pursue other options, can someone please gank
> the links that are up there right now?

Already done... if you see any left lmk.

-- 
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL