X-Original-To: pgsql-advocacy-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B9C511F65FC for ; Sun, 9 Apr 2006 00:18:02 -0300 (ADT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Score: 1.048 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.048 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.569, DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE=0.479] Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id neg6Nh7BCNnI for ; Sun, 9 Apr 2006 00:17:59 -0300 (ADT) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [200.46.204.220]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA5F311F6028 for ; Sun, 9 Apr 2006 00:17:59 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90D3362C945 for ; Sun, 9 Apr 2006 00:17:59 -0300 (ADT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org Received: from hub.org ([200.46.204.220]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mqSNuIXZrCwW; Sun, 9 Apr 2006 00:17:56 -0300 (ADT) Received: from ganymede.hub.org (blk-222-82-85.eastlink.ca [24.222.82.85]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E91A562C939; Sun, 9 Apr 2006 00:17:55 -0300 (ADT) Received: by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 96319475D2; Sun, 9 Apr 2006 00:17:54 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F9F34759C; Sun, 9 Apr 2006 00:17:54 -0300 (ADT) Date: Sun, 9 Apr 2006 00:17:54 -0300 (ADT) From: "Marc G. Fournier" X-X-Sender: scrappy@ganymede.hub.org To: Josh Berkus cc: pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org, Greg Sabino Mullane Subject: Re: Further SPI In-Reply-To: <200604081554.44048.josh@agliodbs.com> Message-ID: <20060409001455.X1096@ganymede.hub.org> References: <200604081554.44048.josh@agliodbs.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Archive-Number: 200604/37 X-Sequence-Number: 8825 On Sat, 8 Apr 2006, Josh Berkus wrote: > Also, I'm very dubious about the claim that people will be willing to > donate via Paypal who won't donate via Click-and-Pledge. At most, I > imagine that we'd miss out on a couple hundred a year worth of donations > from people who can't be bothered to fill out a web form. That's simply > not worth the risk. Just as an aside here ... I'm one of those that 'shops online' using my Paypal account alot ... main reason: I don't have a credit card ... and sending out a cheque is a royal pain ... ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664