public inbox for [email protected]  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
pgfoundry and gborg
13+ messages / 4 participants
[nested] [flat]

* pgfoundry and gborg
@ 2006-04-12 17:45  Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread

From: Bruce Momjian @ 2006-04-12 17:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: pgsql-www

OK, it is been a few months since our last pgfoundry/gborg discussion,
and I have seen no progress in moving to only one site.  I now propose
we shut off gborg on June 1, and announce that fact!

-- 
  Bruce Momjian   http://candle.pha.pa.us
  EnterpriseDB    http://www.enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 13+ messages in thread

* Re: pgfoundry and gborg
@ 2006-04-12 18:09  Josh Berkus <[email protected]>
  parent: Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread

From: Josh Berkus @ 2006-04-12 18:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: pgsql-www; +Cc: Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>

Bruce,

> OK, it is been a few months since our last pgfoundry/gborg discussion,
> and I have seen no progress in moving to only one site.  I now propose
> we shut off gborg on June 1, and announce that fact!

I've been busy.  But I think that deadline is doable.

--Josh

-- 
__Aglio Database Solutions_______________
Josh Berkus		       Consultant
[email protected]	 www.agliodbs.com
Ph: 415-752-2500	Fax: 415-752-2387
2166 Hayes Suite 200	San Francisco, CA



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 13+ messages in thread

* Re: pgfoundry and gborg
@ 2006-04-12 18:10  Dave Page <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread

From: Dave Page @ 2006-04-12 18:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: [email protected]; pgsql-www


-----Original Message-----
From: "Bruce Momjian"<[email protected]>
Sent: 12/04/06 18:45:23
To: "PostgreSQL www"<[email protected]>
Subject: [pgsql-www] pgfoundry and gborg

>  I now propose
> we shut off gborg on June 1, and 
> announce that fact!

As far as I'm aware we haven't even told project owners that we want them to move, let alone offered them a migration path (I certainly never received anything as owner of multiple projects. Simply turning it off seems a good way to really cheese ppl off :-(

Regards, Dave

-----Unmodified Original Message-----
OK, it is been a few months since our last pgfoundry/gborg discussion,
and I have seen no progress in moving to only one site.  I now propose
we shut off gborg on June 1, and announce that fact!

-- 
  Bruce Momjian   http://candle.pha.pa.us
  EnterpriseDB    http://www.enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 13+ messages in thread

* Re: pgfoundry and gborg
@ 2006-04-12 18:46  Marc G. Fournier <[email protected]>
  parent: Josh Berkus <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread

From: Marc G. Fournier @ 2006-04-12 18:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Josh Berkus <[email protected]>; +Cc: pgsql-www; Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>

On Wed, 12 Apr 2006, Josh Berkus wrote:

> Bruce,
>
>> OK, it is been a few months since our last pgfoundry/gborg discussion,
>> and I have seen no progress in moving to only one site.  I now propose
>> we shut off gborg on June 1, and announce that fact!
>
> I've been busy.  But I think that deadline is doable.

I won't claim busy on this one ... I'll claim fear of migrating the 
database stuff :(

We had a migration script built at one point ... does/can it work "per 
project"?  If so, I have no problems with working with project admins on a 
one-on-one basis to getting their projects migrated over ... I know Thomas 
Hallgren(sp?) will *happily* act as a guinea pig to test the script ...

----
Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: [email protected]           Yahoo!: yscrappy              ICQ: 7615664



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 13+ messages in thread

* Re: pgfoundry and gborg
@ 2006-04-12 18:53  Josh Berkus <[email protected]>
  parent: Marc G. Fournier <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread

From: Josh Berkus @ 2006-04-12 18:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Marc G. Fournier <[email protected]>; +Cc: pgsql-www; Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>

Mark,

> I won't claim busy on this one ... I'll claim fear of migrating the
> database stuff :(

yeah, everybody has that.

>
> We had a migration script built at one point ... does/can it work "per
> project"?  If so, I have no problems with working with project admins on
> a one-on-one basis to getting their projects migrated over ... I know
> Thomas Hallgren(sp?) will *happily* act as a guinea pig to test the
> script ...

The script was never fully debugged.  I'll have to do that.

-- 
--Josh

Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL @ Sun
San Francisco



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 13+ messages in thread

* Re: pgfoundry and gborg
@ 2006-04-12 21:33  Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>
  parent: Dave Page <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread

From: Bruce Momjian @ 2006-04-12 21:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Dave Page <[email protected]>; +Cc: pgsql-www

Dave Page wrote:
> As far as I'm aware we haven't even told project owners that we want
> them to move, let alone offered them a migration path (I certainly
> never received anything as owner of multiple projects. Simply turning
> it off seems a good way to really cheese ppl off :-(

At this point, I am happy to do _exactly_ that!  It is what will make it
get completed.

--
  Bruce Momjian   http://candle.pha.pa.us
  EnterpriseDB    http://www.enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +




^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 13+ messages in thread

* Re: pgfoundry and gborg
@ 2006-04-12 21:37  Marc G. Fournier <[email protected]>
  parent: Josh Berkus <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread

From: Marc G. Fournier @ 2006-04-12 21:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Josh Berkus <[email protected]>; +Cc: Marc G. Fournier <[email protected]>; pgsql-www; Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>

On Wed, 12 Apr 2006, Josh Berkus wrote:

> Mark,
>
>> I won't claim busy on this one ... I'll claim fear of migrating the
>> database stuff :(
>
> yeah, everybody has that.
>
>>
>> We had a migration script built at one point ... does/can it work "per
>> project"?  If so, I have no problems with working with project admins on
>> a one-on-one basis to getting their projects migrated over ... I know
>> Thomas Hallgren(sp?) will *happily* act as a guinea pig to test the
>> script ...
>
> The script was never fully debugged.  I'll have to do that.

As I said above, if you can spend the time to give me a clean "per 
project" script, I have to problems with doing the "per project" migration 
...

----
Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: [email protected]           Yahoo!: yscrappy              ICQ: 7615664



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 13+ messages in thread

* Re: pgfoundry and gborg
@ 2006-04-12 21:43  Josh Berkus <[email protected]>
  parent: Marc G. Fournier <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread

From: Josh Berkus @ 2006-04-12 21:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: pgsql-www; +Cc: Marc G. Fournier <[email protected]>; Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>

Marc,

> As I said above, if you can spend the time to give me a clean "per
> project" script, I have to problems with doing the "per project"
> migration ...

Sounds like a plan.

Question, again: am I correct that it will be easier to migrate mailman and 
CVS *before* moving to the new server, rather than after?

-- 
--Josh

Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL @ Sun
San Francisco



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 13+ messages in thread

* Re: pgfoundry and gborg
@ 2006-04-12 21:58  Marc G. Fournier <[email protected]>
  parent: Josh Berkus <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread

From: Marc G. Fournier @ 2006-04-12 21:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Josh Berkus <[email protected]>; +Cc: pgsql-www; Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>

On Wed, 12 Apr 2006, Josh Berkus wrote:

> Marc,
>
>> As I said above, if you can spend the time to give me a clean "per
>> project" script, I have to problems with doing the "per project"
>> migration ...
>
> Sounds like a plan.
>
> Question, again: am I correct that it will be easier to migrate mailman and
> CVS *before* moving to the new server, rather than after?

I'd say about the same ... rsync can be used in either case ... but, both 
being on the local network will eliminate any network delay ... its your 
call though ...

----
Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: [email protected]           Yahoo!: yscrappy              ICQ: 7615664



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 13+ messages in thread

* Re: pgfoundry and gborg
@ 2006-04-12 22:01  Marc G. Fournier <[email protected]>
  parent: Marc G. Fournier <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread

From: Marc G. Fournier @ 2006-04-12 22:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Marc G. Fournier <[email protected]>; +Cc: Josh Berkus <[email protected]>; pgsql-www; Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>

On Wed, 12 Apr 2006, Marc G. Fournier wrote:

> On Wed, 12 Apr 2006, Josh Berkus wrote:
>
>> Marc,
>> 
>>> As I said above, if you can spend the time to give me a clean "per
>>> project" script, I have to problems with doing the "per project"
>>> migration ...
>> 
>> Sounds like a plan.
>> 
>> Question, again: am I correct that it will be easier to migrate mailman and
>> CVS *before* moving to the new server, rather than after?
>
> I'd say about the same ... rsync can be used in either case ... but, both 
> being on the local network will eliminate any network delay ... its your call 
> though ...

Appendum: but, we don't know how easy getting pgfoundry moved to the new 
server is going to be yet ... we've done the file/ports stuff, but, as far 
as I know, we haven't done any testing of the result (ie. run it live and 
check for any issues) ... if you want to move it to the new server first, 
let's concentrate on that and then worry about gborg->pgfoundry ...

----
Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: [email protected]           Yahoo!: yscrappy              ICQ: 7615664



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 13+ messages in thread

* Re: pgfoundry and gborg
@ 2006-04-12 22:23  Josh Berkus <[email protected]>
  parent: Marc G. Fournier <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread

From: Josh Berkus @ 2006-04-12 22:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: pgsql-www; +Cc: Marc G. Fournier <[email protected]>; Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>

Marc,

> Appendum: but, we don't know how easy getting pgfoundry moved to the new
> server is going to be yet ... we've done the file/ports stuff, but, as
> far as I know, we haven't done any testing of the result (ie. run it
> live and check for any issues) ... if you want to move it to the new
> server first, let's concentrate on that and then worry about
> gborg->pgfoundry ...

No, the new server isn't ready yet so we can do things in any order -- 
there's issues with Apache and with one drive which I and Sean are working 
on.  The idea, though, is to have everything on pgfoundry on the new 
faster server by June 1.

-- 
--Josh

Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL @ Sun
San Francisco



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 13+ messages in thread

* Re: pgfoundry and gborg
@ 2006-04-12 23:14  Marc G. Fournier <[email protected]>
  parent: Josh Berkus <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread

From: Marc G. Fournier @ 2006-04-12 23:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Josh Berkus <[email protected]>; +Cc: pgsql-www; Marc G. Fournier <[email protected]>; Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>

On Wed, 12 Apr 2006, Josh Berkus wrote:

> Marc,
>
>> Appendum: but, we don't know how easy getting pgfoundry moved to the new
>> server is going to be yet ... we've done the file/ports stuff, but, as
>> far as I know, we haven't done any testing of the result (ie. run it
>> live and check for any issues) ... if you want to move it to the new
>> server first, let's concentrate on that and then worry about
>> gborg->pgfoundry ...
>
> No, the new server isn't ready yet so we can do things in any order --
> there's issues with Apache and with one drive which I and Sean are working
> on.  The idea, though, is to have everything on pgfoundry on the new
> faster server by June 1.

Well, if you *want*, we could do the conversion to FreeBSD 6.x / amd64 
right away, so that while you and Sean are working out the issues with the 
new server, we can get that part completed ... would just be a matter of 
upgrading software, without having to move databases at the same time ... 
then it would truly just be an 'rsync' to get it moved to the new server 
...

----
Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: [email protected]           Yahoo!: yscrappy              ICQ: 7615664




^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 13+ messages in thread

* Re: pgfoundry and gborg
@ 2006-04-13 08:49  Dave Page <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread

From: Dave Page @ 2006-04-13 08:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>; +Cc: pgsql-www

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:[email protected]] 
> Sent: 12 April 2006 22:33
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] pgfoundry and gborg
> 
> Dave Page wrote:
> > As far as I'm aware we haven't even told project owners 
> that we want 
> > them to move, let alone offered them a migration path (I certainly 
> > never received anything as owner of multiple projects. 
> Simply turning 
> > it off seems a good way to really cheese ppl off :-(
> 
> At this point, I am happy to do _exactly_ that!  It is what 
> will make it get completed.

OK, I'll send any disgruntled project owners your way :-)

Seriously though, if nothing else we should give them notice ASAP that
this is going to be done.

Oh, and moving the pgweb project will require some non-trivial work to
ensure it doesn't break www.postgresql.org.

Regards, Dave.




^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 13+ messages in thread


end of thread, other threads:[~2006-04-13 08:49 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages (download: mbox mbox.gz follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-04-12 17:45 pgfoundry and gborg Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>
2006-04-12 18:09 ` Josh Berkus <[email protected]>
2006-04-12 18:46   ` Marc G. Fournier <[email protected]>
2006-04-12 18:53     ` Josh Berkus <[email protected]>
2006-04-12 21:37       ` Marc G. Fournier <[email protected]>
2006-04-12 21:43         ` Josh Berkus <[email protected]>
2006-04-12 21:58           ` Marc G. Fournier <[email protected]>
2006-04-12 22:01             ` Marc G. Fournier <[email protected]>
2006-04-12 22:23               ` Josh Berkus <[email protected]>
2006-04-12 23:14                 ` Marc G. Fournier <[email protected]>
2006-04-12 18:10 Re: pgfoundry and gborg Dave Page <[email protected]>
2006-04-12 21:33 ` Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>
2006-04-13 08:49 Re: pgfoundry and gborg Dave Page <[email protected]>

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox