X-Original-To: pgsql-hackers-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CAAD9FA279 for ; Sat, 20 May 2006 16:04:06 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 48101-09 for ; Sat, 20 May 2006 16:04:01 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from davinci.ethosmedia.com (server227.ethosmedia.com [209.128.84.227]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B99079FA218 for ; Sat, 20 May 2006 16:04:01 -0300 (ADT) X-EthosMedia-Virus-Scanned: no infections found Received: from [63.195.55.98] (account josh@agliodbs.com HELO spooky.sf.agliodbs.com) by davinci.ethosmedia.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8) with ESMTP id 9446585 for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Sat, 20 May 2006 12:07:07 -0700 From: Josh Berkus Organization: Aglio Database Solutions Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Toward A Positive Marketing Approach. Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 12:03:53 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org References: <446CD9F3.9020100@sourceview.com> <200605191018.00798.josh@agliodbs.com> <2869.1148062998@sss.pgh.pa.us> In-Reply-To: <2869.1148062998@sss.pgh.pa.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline To: Undisclosed.Recipients: ; Message-Id: <200605201203.53969.josh@agliodbs.com> X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200605/827 X-Sequence-Number: 83692 Tom, > or is the real > problem that it'd take a whole lot of both OO-fu and Postgres-fu? > If so, can we find someone with the former nature to collaborate with? OO-Fu, mostly. I've already posted to the DBA project on OOo. -- Josh Berkus Aglio Database Solutions San Francisco