X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85B909FA42B for ; Sun, 28 May 2006 13:20:27 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 35859-03 for ; Sun, 28 May 2006 13:20:21 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from tigger.fuhr.org (tigger.fuhr.org [63.214.45.158]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A95569F9F3D for ; Sun, 28 May 2006 13:20:20 -0300 (ADT) Received: from winnie.fuhr.org (winnie.fuhr.org [10.1.0.1]) by tigger.fuhr.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k4SGK9b0020708 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Sun, 28 May 2006 10:20:12 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from mfuhr@winnie.fuhr.org) Received: from winnie.fuhr.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by winnie.fuhr.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k4SGK8q2069685; Sun, 28 May 2006 10:20:08 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from mfuhr@winnie.fuhr.org) Received: (from mfuhr@localhost) by winnie.fuhr.org (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id k4SGK8wG069684; Sun, 28 May 2006 10:20:08 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from mfuhr) Date: Sun, 28 May 2006 10:20:08 -0600 From: Michael Fuhr To: Tom Lane Cc: Robert Treat , pgsql-www@postgresql.org, Jeff Amiel Subject: Re: Why is April 21 listed twice in the pgsql-general web archive? Message-ID: <20060528162008.GA69635@winnie.fuhr.org> References: <4448F391.5000908@istreamimaging.com> <200605280945.41753.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> <17795.1148832730@sss.pgh.pa.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <17795.1148832730@sss.pgh.pa.us> X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200605/191 X-Sequence-Number: 10154 On Sun, May 28, 2006 at 12:12:10PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > The other problem that the archive pages have had since forever is the > tendency to show a few garbage "[no subject]" entries near the top of > the newest page for a list. These always point to what seem to be > partial messages. I do not know if this represents the archiving > process storing bad data, or the web page generator misinterpreting > what's stored. I investigated this several months ago and suggested a possible cause: that a paragraph beginning with "From " is being parsed as the beginning of a new message. http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-www/2006-02/msg00083.php -- Michael Fuhr