From: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
Reply-To: josh@agliodbs.com
Organization: Aglio Database Solutions
To: pgsql-www@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL and success of OSS
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 11:24:23 -0700
User-Agent: KMail/1.8
Cc: Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>,
	"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>,
	Brent Wilkins <wilkins@cs.colostate.edu>
References: <63ebab9b0606281026t5e125670ye8771f883e76954a@mail.gmail.com>
	<200606281320.19546.josh@agliodbs.com>
	<200606291120.36254.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>
In-Reply-To: <200606291120.36254.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200606291124.23896.josh@agliodbs.com>

Robert,

> I wonder if that number would need to be bumped up in a rather handwavy
> manner (amybe +50) on the grounds of companies like enterprisedb,
> fujitsu, greenplum, and sun, which I would guess have developers working
> behind the scenes on issues thier companies care most about, which then
> get filtered up through a few individuals to the community at large. 
> Additionally we also have more "closely tied" projects like slony and
> npgsql to draw in more people.  Thoughts?

No, I think if we change the numbers, we need to do a full re-count.

-- 
--Josh

Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL @ Sun
San Francisco