X-Original-To: pgsql-general-postgresql.org@postgresql.org Received: from localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B4E19FA192 for ; Fri, 30 Jun 2006 14:30:48 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 86056-02 for ; Fri, 30 Jun 2006 14:30:39 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from fetter.org (dsl092-188-065.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.92.188.65]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD99C9FA0EC for ; Fri, 30 Jun 2006 14:30:38 -0300 (ADT) Received: by fetter.org (Postfix, from userid 500) id 974D8C62BA; Fri, 30 Jun 2006 10:30:37 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 10:30:37 -0700 From: David Fetter To: Tom Lane Cc: Scott Marlowe , Jason McManus , pgsql general Subject: Re: Notes on converting from MySQL 5.0.x to PostgreSQL Message-ID: <20060630173037.GC7035@fetter.org> References: <1151680333.13129.55.camel@state.g2switchworks.com> <24350.1151681944@sss.pgh.pa.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <24350.1151681944@sss.pgh.pa.us> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200606/1234 X-Sequence-Number: 97606 On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 11:39:04AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Scott Marlowe writes: > > On Fri, 2006-06-30 at 08:17, Jason McManus wrote: > >> * Replication support still rudimentary. > > It might be worth pointing out that mysql's replication falls over > if you so much as look at it crosseyed. I have not had to use it > for production purposes, but I can tell you that the mysql > replication regression tests fail ... irreproducibly of course ... > almost one time in two in Red Hat's build environment. Are those tests, or at least descriptions of them, available? Cheers, D -- David Fetter http://fetter.org/ phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Skype: davidfetter Remember to vote!