X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@postgresql.org Received: from localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB51E9FB2D3; Wed, 9 Aug 2006 08:44:37 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 38845-05; Wed, 9 Aug 2006 08:44:27 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from eastrmmtao01.cox.net (eastrmmtao01.cox.net [68.230.240.38]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2C539FB220; Wed, 9 Aug 2006 08:44:26 -0300 (ADT) Received: from [192.168.0.8] (really [68.226.0.201]) by eastrmmtao01.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.06.01 201-2131-130-101-20060113) with ESMTP id <20060809114424.ZXLF18847.eastrmmtao01.cox.net@[192.168.0.8]>; Wed, 9 Aug 2006 07:44:24 -0400 From: Robert Treat To: pgsql-www@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Please replace foundations. server ... Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 07:44:15 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 Cc: "Joshua D. Drake" , "Marc G. Fournier" , Josh Berkus References: <200608071446.39505.josh@agliodbs.com> <20060807235121.S7267@ganymede.hub.org> <44D80319.5000304@commandprompt.com> In-Reply-To: <44D80319.5000304@commandprompt.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200608090744.15640.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.04 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200608/43 X-Sequence-Number: 10434 On Monday 07 August 2006 23:20, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > On Mon, 7 Aug 2006, Josh Berkus wrote: > >> Marc, > >> > >> Can we have another pointer to what used to be > >> foundation.postgresql.org? Given that we are a multi-foundation group, I > >> think the new URL should be spi.postgresql.org. The FG needs a place > >> to take votes and exchange documents. Thanks! > > You're apparently more optimistic about the current proposed voting structure than I am ;-) > > 'k, just to confirm: remove foundation.postgreql.org, add > > spi.postgresql.org and point that to conference.postgresql.org? > > I am not going to raise a fuss, but I would really prefer either > foundation. or fundsgroup. > > spi is kind of incorrect although I can see the reason for the choice. > I have this vaugue recollection from the pg summit that we we're going to add a top level menu item into the postgresql.org website for "foundation" with information about the various foundations and sponsors / donors; and foundation.postgresql.org was going to point to that. Is that getting tossed out the window? -- Robert Treat Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL