X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@postgresql.org
Received: from localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 739919FB1F0
	for <pgsql-www-postgresql.org@postgresql.org>;
	Fri, 11 Aug 2006 12:52:09 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 91437-01 for <pgsql-www-postgresql.org@postgresql.org>;
	Fri, 11 Aug 2006 12:52:00 -0300 (ADT)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-
Received: from momjian.us (momjian.us [70.90.9.53])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D627A9FB1EB
	for <pgsql-www@postgresql.org>; Fri, 11 Aug 2006 12:51:59 -0300 (ADT)
Received: (from bruce@localhost) by momjian.us (8.11.6/8.11.6) id
 k7BFpxQ19853;
	Fri, 11 Aug 2006 11:51:59 -0400 (EDT)
From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Message-Id: <200608111551.k7BFpxQ19853@momjian.us>
Subject: Re: Is archives working for August?
In-Reply-To: <44DCA51F.70905@commandprompt.com>
To: "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 11:51:59 -0400 (EDT)
CC: PostgreSQL www <pgsql-www@postgresql.org>
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL122k (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.058 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL,
	SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 200608/89
X-Sequence-Number: 10480

Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Uh, this still is not working.  Can someone else confirm the failure?
> > 
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > 
> > Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >> I just searched the PostgreSQL archives for  'packages' sorted by date:
> >>
> >> 	http://search.postgresql.org/archives.search?cs=utf-8&fm=on&dt=back&q=packages&ul=http%3A%2F%2Farchives.postgresql.org%2F%25&dp=0&o=0&ps=20&s=date
> >>
> >> The first item is July, not August, even though there was a posting
> 
> I can confirm this behavior. However I have not confirmed that it is the 
> archives versus the search engine. Search may not have indexed it yet.

But the posting is from August 7:

    * From: "Pavel Stehule" <pavel ( dot ) stehule ( at ) hotmail ( dot ) com>
    * To: pgsql-hackers ( at ) postgresql ( dot ) org
    * Subject: proposal for PL packages for 8.3.
    * Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2006 11:44:42 +0200

Certainly our delay for indexing isn't four days.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian   bruce@momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB    http://www.enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +