From: Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>
To: pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL rebranding
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 07:11:47 -0400
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1
Cc: Ron Mayer <rm_pg@cheapcomplexdevices.com>,
	Lukas Kahwe Smith <smith@pooteeweet.org>
References: <44F3F0EC.2080709@pooteeweet.org>
	<44F55F67.6030407@cheapcomplexdevices.com>
In-Reply-To: <44F55F67.6030407@cheapcomplexdevices.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200608300711.48251.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>

On Wednesday 30 August 2006 05:50, Ron Mayer wrote:
> Fujitsu's FSP (Fujitsu Supported PostgreSQL) [3] should probably be
> added to your list.   This one's a useful one to remember when you
> encounter a pointy-haired boss that wants support from a large
> company - you wouldn't want to trust your business to a database that's
> only supported by little companies like Oracle, would you? :-)
> I think like Netezza they heavily modified postgresql; in this case
> with their own storage manager.
>

Yes, and fujitsu also has it's own storage engine that they use for some 
clients though they also support standard postgresql under that label too 
aiui.  Liam O'Duibhir, who is on this list, is probably the best contact for 
more info. 

-- 
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL