X-Original-To: pgsql-advocacy-postgresql.org@postgresql.org Received: from localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F0229FB300 for ; Wed, 30 Aug 2006 12:01:50 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 38003-03 for ; Wed, 30 Aug 2006 12:01:37 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from a.mail.sonic.net (a.mail.sonic.net [64.142.16.245]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F5919FB2F2 for ; Wed, 30 Aug 2006 12:01:36 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (64-142-36-103.dsl.static.sonic.net [64.142.36.103]) by a.mail.sonic.net (8.13.8.Beta0-Sonic/8.13.7) with ESMTP id k7UF1SNX009054 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 30 Aug 2006 08:01:29 -0700 Received: from elein by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.50) id 1GIRSm-0001TC-Iw; Wed, 30 Aug 2006 07:54:44 -0700 Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 07:54:44 -0700 To: Ron Mayer Cc: Lukas Kahwe Smith , pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org Subject: Re: PostgreSQL rebranding Message-ID: <20060830145444.GB5155@varlena.com> Mail-Followup-To: Ron Mayer , Lukas Kahwe Smith , pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org References: <44F3F0EC.2080709@pooteeweet.org> <44F55F67.6030407@cheapcomplexdevices.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <44F55F67.6030407@cheapcomplexdevices.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i From: elein X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.167 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL, FORGED_RCVD_HELO X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200608/189 X-Sequence-Number: 9653 On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 02:50:31AM -0700, Ron Mayer wrote: > Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote: > > > > I am collecting a list of PostgreSQL rebrands. > > > > So far I have the following: > > > > Illustra, EnterpriseDB, Bizgres, BizgresMPP, Mammoth, Red Hat Database, > > Netezza, parACCEL > > > > Sun's "Thumper" [1] arguably counts at least as much as Netezza does, > in that they're both hardware appliances derived more or less from PostgreSQL. Don't count hardware appliances that use postgres. There are a several that I know about and probably a lot more. You won't get them all. --elein elein@varlena.com > > And not sure if you'd count domain specific apps built on postgresql > like Cisco's CSR / Carrier-Sensitive Routing product[2]. If you > count that there are probably dozens of similar products that are > built on top of a bundled postgresql. > > Fujitsu's FSP (Fujitsu Supported PostgreSQL) [3] should probably be > added to your list. This one's a useful one to remember when you > encounter a pointy-haired boss that wants support from a large > company - you wouldn't want to trust your business to a database that's > only supported by little companies like Oracle, would you? :-) > I think like Netezza they heavily modified postgresql; in this case > with their own storage manager. > > > [1]http://www.techworld.com/storage/features/index.cfm?featureid=2738 > [2]http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/voice/csr/usergd/ver1_1/csrover.pdf > [3]http://www.fastware.com/postgresql.html > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend >