X-Original-To: pgsql-advocacy-postgresql.org@postgresql.org Received: from localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A56E89FB335 for ; Wed, 30 Aug 2006 15:26:24 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 62880-01-6 for ; Wed, 30 Aug 2006 15:26:13 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from momjian.us (momjian.us [70.90.9.53]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD5DB9FB351 for ; Wed, 30 Aug 2006 15:24:10 -0300 (ADT) Received: (from bruce@localhost) by momjian.us (8.11.6/8.11.6) id k7UIO6k21646; Wed, 30 Aug 2006 14:24:06 -0400 (EDT) From: Bruce Momjian Message-Id: <200608301824.k7UIO6k21646@momjian.us> Subject: Re: PostgreSQL rebranding In-Reply-To: <44F55F67.6030407@cheapcomplexdevices.com> To: Ron Mayer Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 14:24:06 -0400 (EDT) CC: Lukas Kahwe Smith , pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL123] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.12 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200608/198 X-Sequence-Number: 9662 Should we have this information on our web site somewhere? --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ron Mayer wrote: > Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote: > > > > I am collecting a list of PostgreSQL rebrands. > > > > So far I have the following: > > > > Illustra, EnterpriseDB, Bizgres, BizgresMPP, Mammoth, Red Hat Database, > > Netezza, parACCEL > > > > Sun's "Thumper" [1] arguably counts at least as much as Netezza does, > in that they're both hardware appliances derived more or less from PostgreSQL. > > And not sure if you'd count domain specific apps built on postgresql > like Cisco's CSR / Carrier-Sensitive Routing product[2]. If you > count that there are probably dozens of similar products that are > built on top of a bundled postgresql. > > Fujitsu's FSP (Fujitsu Supported PostgreSQL) [3] should probably be > added to your list. This one's a useful one to remember when you > encounter a pointy-haired boss that wants support from a large > company - you wouldn't want to trust your business to a database that's > only supported by little companies like Oracle, would you? :-) > I think like Netezza they heavily modified postgresql; in this case > with their own storage manager. > > > [1]http://www.techworld.com/storage/features/index.cfm?featureid=2738 > [2]http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/voice/csr/usergd/ver1_1/csrover.pdf > [3]http://www.fastware.com/postgresql.html > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend -- Bruce Momjian bruce@momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +