Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 15:28:36 -0400
From: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org
Subject: Re: Getting a move on for 8.2 beta
Message-ID: <20060901192835.GB16534@kenobi.snowman.net>
Mail-Followup-To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>,
	pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org
References: <5364.1157125854@sss.pgh.pa.us>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="4bRzO86E/ozDv8r1"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <5364.1157125854@sss.pgh.pa.us>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14


--4bRzO86E/ozDv8r1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

* Tom Lane (tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
> My feeling is that we ought to bounce bitmap indexes and updatable views
> as not being ready, accept all the contrib stuff, and try to get the
> other items done in time for a beta at, say, the end of next week.

I agree with bouncing these to get the beta out, though I hate having
to wait another year for them.  If things change in some way and we have
the opportunity to fit one in this time, I'd rather see updatable views
than bitmap indexes, personally.

Overall, I really think 8.2 is going to be an excellent release.  I wish
autovacuum could have been enabled by default and I'd just like to ask,
now and I'll try to remember again once 8.2 is out, please let's turn it
on by default for 8.3 (and early on so we get some good testing of it).

	Thanks,

		Stephen

--4bRzO86E/ozDv8r1
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFE+InjrzgMPqB3kigRAjZbAJ9IxOshXMTf5ZhPAuoLW35NSLo7OgCZAdXO
v232vDRBpBdb2W07+aR14IQ=
=BbaF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--4bRzO86E/ozDv8r1--