From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Getting a move on for 8.2 beta
Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 00:25:54 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.3
Cc: "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>,
 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
References: <5364.1157125854@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20304.1157141401@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<44F8992A.8030600@commandprompt.com>
In-Reply-To: <44F8992A.8030600@commandprompt.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200609020025.55490.peter_e@gmx.net>

Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Let's take multiple-argument aggregate functions for example... The
> marketable portion of that is limited. 85% of the people we are
> marketing too don't even know what that means. Heck, I haven't even
> run into the pervious limitation :)

As far as market analysis goes, I'd guess that 100% of the people who 
already use PostgreSQL by definition don't need any new features and 
would rather see incremental improvements across the board, which is 
what this or any release would give them.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/