From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Getting a move on for 8.2 beta
Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 00:28:56 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.3
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>,
 josh@agliodbs.com
References: <5364.1157125854@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<200609011207.38628.josh@agliodbs.com>
	<17881.1157138424@sss.pgh.pa.us>
In-Reply-To: <17881.1157138424@sss.pgh.pa.us>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200609020028.57260.peter_e@gmx.net>

Tom Lane wrote:
> Well, it's taken us the full month to get this far through the queue,
> so I'd sure like to have more people on board reviewing next time. 
> Alvaro helped but I miss Neil Conway, and some other people have
> helped in the past.  However --- the present situation has nothing to
> do with lack of reviewers, it's lack of time to finish the patches.

Not that I've had particularly plenty of time to give, but what's 
concerning me is that while we're moving toward an increasingly rigid 
process, we don't really have the process support to go with it.  How 
would anyone even know what patches are pending review?  Something to 
think about ...

-- 
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/