X-Original-To: pgsql-hackers-postgresql.org@postgresql.org Received: from localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFD999FB260 for ; Fri, 1 Sep 2006 21:35:10 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 58090-03-4 for ; Fri, 1 Sep 2006 21:34:31 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from momjian.us (momjian.us [70.90.9.53]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80E039FB47B for ; Fri, 1 Sep 2006 21:32:47 -0300 (ADT) Received: (from bruce@localhost) by momjian.us (8.11.6/8.11.6) id k820Wlr25548; Fri, 1 Sep 2006 20:32:47 -0400 (EDT) From: Bruce Momjian Message-Id: <200609020032.k820Wlr25548@momjian.us> Subject: Re: Getting a move on for 8.2 beta In-Reply-To: <200609011639.42280.josh@agliodbs.com> To: josh@agliodbs.com Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 20:32:47 -0400 (EDT) CC: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, Tom Lane X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL123] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.115 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200609/86 X-Sequence-Number: 89615 Josh Berkus wrote: > Bruce, Tom, all: > > > No rejiggering is going to get people to complete things they didn't > > complete under the old system. > > It'll help the new people. A lot of people -- if not most -- submitting > their first major patch to PostgreSQL dramatically underestimate the > amount of fix-up that's going to be required, and assume that there won't > be a spec discussion, which there often is. By getting them to submit a > little at a time, *earlier*, we can avoid doing those things at the last > minute. That is in the developer's FAQ. > Alternately, we can just make sure that first-time patchers have mentors > who check progress well before feature freeze. > > > The plan you list above is what we did > > for this release. > > No, it's not. There's a bunch of patches which we had nothing on -- not > spec, not design draft, not anything -- until we got them on July 20th. > Our current system is to have only one deadline, at which point you're > expected to have 85% of the patch done and up to PostgreSQL standards. > That's quite a bit of "jumping in with both feet" for a newbie. Right. The developer's FAQ says they should follow a process. Making another process doesn't mean they will follow that either. > > > I did try to get us additional help in reviewing. Neil was unavailable, > > and Alvaro could only give part of his time > > Asking two people is not exactly an all-out effort to get reviewers. Well, not sure what else I can do. Those are the people who used to help out a lot. > > It strikes me that setting feature freeze in midsummer might not be the > > best strategy for having manpower available to review --- people tend to > > be on vacation in August. Maybe the answer is just to move the dates a > > bit one way or the other. > > We've discussed that issue before, yes. Since we're proposing a new > roadmap process for 8.3, and will likely be dealing with a lot of major > patches, maybe that's the release to delay? Moving it away from summer might help, yea. -- Bruce Momjian bruce@momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +