From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Message-Id: <200609020038.k820cvH26537@momjian.us>
Subject: Re: Getting a move on for 8.2 beta
In-Reply-To: <44F8D25A.6070902@commandprompt.com>
To: "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 20:38:57 -0400 (EDT)
CC: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org,
	Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, josh@agliodbs.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"

Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> >> Tom Lane wrote:
> >>> Well, it's taken us the full month to get this far through the queue,
> >>> so I'd sure like to have more people on board reviewing next time. 
> >>> Alvaro helped but I miss Neil Conway, and some other people have
> >>> helped in the past.  However --- the present situation has nothing to
> >>> do with lack of reviewers, it's lack of time to finish the patches.
> >> Not that I've had particularly plenty of time to give, but what's 
> >> concerning me is that while we're moving toward an increasingly rigid 
> >> process, we don't really have the process support to go with it.  How 
> >> would anyone even know what patches are pending review?  Something to 
> >> think about ...
> > 
> > They are in the patches queue?
> > 
> > 	http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches
> 
> Side note::
> 
> Perhaps this would be better served from the main website under the 
> developer and community sections.

It pulls my a mailbox file I use, and it does instant updates as soon as
I change it.  It is a URL.  Why do people care where it is?

-- 
  Bruce Momjian   bruce@momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB    http://www.enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +