From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Postgres tracking - the pgtrack project
Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 18:21:29 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.3
Cc: "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg@turnstep.com>
References: <621fdf7c380b797f32c1ac0f7bccffd4@biglumber.com>
In-Reply-To: <621fdf7c380b797f32c1ac0f7bccffd4@biglumber.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200609021821.29622.peter_e@gmx.net>

Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
> There are a number of reasons for this, not least of which is the
> enormous and ever-changing requirements such a system would have to
> have.

> The buildfarm is an excellent example of this.

The build farm is not an example of this.  There isn't any build-farm 
software out there.  There is, however, plenty of issue tracking 
software out there.

Just pointing that out.  Have at it.  I for one would rather set up 
existing issue trackers and work with them.  If I could just find 
hardware to host it.  Not that I've looked, though.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/