X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@postgresql.org Received: from localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A83C99FB3AC for ; Thu, 7 Sep 2006 00:10:34 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 08889-04-3 for ; Thu, 7 Sep 2006 00:10:33 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from hub.org (hub.org [200.46.204.220]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B89589FB350 for ; Thu, 7 Sep 2006 00:08:16 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A12B291B0A for ; Thu, 7 Sep 2006 00:08:16 -0300 (ADT) Received: from hub.org ([200.46.204.220]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 08991-03-3; Thu, 7 Sep 2006 00:08:08 -0300 (ADT) Received: from ganymede.hub.org (blk-137-86-60.eastlink.ca [24.137.86.60]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F384A291B0C; Thu, 7 Sep 2006 00:07:17 -0300 (ADT) Received: by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2512548D4F; Thu, 7 Sep 2006 00:07:17 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2458C3CF02; Thu, 7 Sep 2006 00:07:17 -0300 (ADT) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 00:07:17 -0300 (ADT) From: "Marc G. Fournier" X-X-Sender: scrappy@ganymede.hub.org To: Tom Lane cc: pgsql-www@postgreSQL.org Subject: Re: Mailing lists slow ... In-Reply-To: <5762.1157128110@sss.pgh.pa.us> Message-ID: <20060907000607.W13992@ganymede.hub.org> References: <5762.1157128110@sss.pgh.pa.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.564 tagged_above=0 required=5 WHITELISTED tests=AWL, FORGED_RCVD_HELO, RCVD_IN_DSBL X-Spam-Level: * X-Archive-Number: 200609/37 X-Sequence-Number: 10615 On Fri, 1 Sep 2006, Tom Lane wrote: > The PG mailing lists all seem to be suffering about a one-hour round > trip delay today. Can anybody fix that? I believe that this is okay now ... we also have a new 64bit server that got in while I was offline, and is going online next week ... reduce the load on the current 64bit server by half and speed up the virus/spam filtering daemons ... ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . scrappy@hub.org MSN . scrappy@hub.org Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664