X-Original-To: pgsql-hackers-postgresql.org@postgresql.org Received: from localhost (wm.hub.org [200.46.204.128]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38D799F9F0C for ; Thu, 7 Sep 2006 16:05:53 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.128]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 05631-10 for ; Thu, 7 Sep 2006 19:05:43 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from sysexperts.com (cpe-66-1-136-9.ca.sprintbbd.net [66.1.136.9]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D4AE49F9F96 for ; Thu, 7 Sep 2006 16:05:18 -0300 (ADT) Received: (qmail 12749 invoked from network); 7 Sep 2006 19:05:15 -0000 Received: from filer.sysexperts.com (HELO sysexperts.com) (@192.168.1.2) by frobozz.sysexperts.com with SMTP; 7 Sep 2006 19:05:15 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (uid 1000) by filer with local; Thu, 07 Sep 2006 12:05:15 -0700 id 080227A7.45006D6B.0000318F Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 12:05:15 -0700 From: Kevin Brown To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Getting a move on for 8.2 beta Message-ID: <20060907190514.GC11514@filer> Mail-Followup-To: Kevin Brown , pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org References: <200609012223.k81MNUT01820@momjian.us> <25538.1157151327@sss.pgh.pa.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <25538.1157151327@sss.pgh.pa.us> Organization: Frobozzco International User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.133 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=FORGED_RCVD_HELO, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200609/676 X-Sequence-Number: 90205 Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian writes: > > Tom Lane wrote: > >> Well, it's taken us the full month to get this far through the queue, so > >> I'd sure like to have more people on board reviewing next time. Alvaro > >> helped but I miss Neil Conway, and some other people have helped in the > >> past. However --- the present situation has nothing to do with lack of > >> reviewers, it's lack of time to finish the patches. > > > I did try to get us additional help in reviewing. Neil was unavailable, > > and Alvaro could only give part of his time. > > It strikes me that setting feature freeze in midsummer might not be the > best strategy for having manpower available to review --- people tend to > be on vacation in August. Maybe the answer is just to move the dates a > bit one way or the other. Hmm...but if you're going to do that, why not do that now: push the beta date back by, say, a month (or however long you had in mind) for this cycle. That way, the two major patches that are likely to be dropped for this cycle stand a chance to make it into this release, and you accomplish your goal of moving the dates a bit all at the same time. -- Kevin Brown kevin@sysexperts.com