X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@postgresql.org Received: from localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 819C89FB2EB for ; Thu, 21 Sep 2006 18:17:58 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 56420-03-5 for ; Thu, 21 Sep 2006 18:17:42 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from main2.mycybernet.net (main2.mycybernet.net [209.222.63.140]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DB159FB2D7 for ; Thu, 21 Sep 2006 18:17:29 -0300 (ADT) Received: from 227-54-222-209.mycybernet.net ([209.222.54.227] helo=phlogiston.dydns.org) by main2.mycybernet.net with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1GQWBk-0004vk-TB for pgsql-www@postgresql.org; Thu, 21 Sep 2006 17:34:33 -0400 Received: by phlogiston.dydns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6469B4051; Thu, 21 Sep 2006 17:17:19 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 17:17:19 -0400 From: Andrew Sullivan To: pgsql-www@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Who admins DNS? Message-ID: <20060921211719.GE22214@phlogiston.dyndns.org> References: <20060913140007.GC14580@phlogiston.dyndns.org> <6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCEA3569A@algol.sollentuna.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCEA3569A@algol.sollentuna.se> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.205 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL, FORGED_RCVD_HELO X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200609/182 X-Sequence-Number: 10760 On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 11:29:36AM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: > If we can look forward to some further info and possible help from such > DNS experts, I see no reason why we shouldn't wait. So, please let us > know when you're there. So, I spoke to my boss about this. He is an enthusiastic supporter. The project, on which I am currently working, involves a new set of high-availability DNS servers distributed around the world. The first of them is slated to turn up very late in 2006. I anticipate that we should be able to offer a secondary master node, if people would like, some time early in 2007. That is, it would act as an authoritative master, allowing zone transfers to other slaves if we desired. In the meantime, I'm prepared to act as another slave server. The location I'm thinking of putting it has 30Mb connectivity, 12 hour battery and on-site generators; but I could put it somewhere with more bandwidth if people think that'd be necessary. A -- Andrew Sullivan | ajs@crankycanuck.ca Information security isn't a technological problem. It's an economics problem. --Bruce Schneier