Received: from localhost (maia-3.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75F059FB527; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 09:36:12 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 80927-01; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 09:35:17 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.4 X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.4 Received: from vms040pub.verizon.net (vms040pub.verizon.net [206.46.252.40]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FF479FB51F; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 09:35:22 -0400 (AST) Received: from new-host-2.home ([71.166.59.121]) by vms040.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 (built Apr 3 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0JBR00510CESXDMJ@vms040.mailsrvcs.net>; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 07:35:17 -0600 (CST) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 08:35:07 -0500 From: Robert Treat Subject: Re: Problems with pgsql-announce In-reply-to: <45A7495E.7000102@postgresql.org> To: pgsql-www@postgresql.org Cc: Dave Page , "Marc G. Fournier" , josh@agliodbs.com, Greg Sabino Mullane Message-id: <200701120835.07928.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Content-disposition: inline References: <1F8EBA252898A263D638F137@ganymede.hub.org> <45A7495E.7000102@postgresql.org> User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200701/50 X-Sequence-Number: 11317 On Friday 12 January 2007 03:39, Dave Page wrote: > Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > --On Monday, January 08, 2007 12:02:53 -0800 Josh Berkus > > > > > > wrote: > >> Greg, > >> > >>> Yeah, something weird is going on there. From looking at the moderation > >>> queue, it seems everyone is getting three or four duplicates. Maybe > >>> we can simply turn that off, Marc? > >> > >> ... not if duplicates are actually being received; we don't want 3-4 or > >> each message. > > > > Right now, any duplicates are supposed to be shuffled to the moderators > > queue to deal with ... what the filter is *supposed* to deal with is > > spam, which tends to be alot of duplicates of the same message with > > different headers ... > > Don't think I ever saw one in the queue. Plenty of bounces though... > > > If I remove the duplicate altogether, I suspect that there won't be much > > change on the lists themselves, but I don't know for sure ... > > It hasn't made any difference whatsoever to the slaves list, except that > we now get the reports we expect to see. I realise there's a difference > between that and other lists, but it does still get spam. > We could change some of the more public but lower traffic lists, like pgsql-www, first and see how that goes. -- Robert Treat Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL