Received: from localhost (maia-1.hub.org [200.46.204.191]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 329D49FB391 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 10:28:32 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.191]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 16045-03 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 10:28:26 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.4 Received: from svr2.hagander.net (svr2.hagander.net [88.198.128.226]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71D699FB2FD for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 10:28:26 -0400 (AST) Received: from svr2.hagander.net (svr2.hagander.net [88.198.128.226]) by svr2.hagander.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A9B9DCC16C; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 15:28:24 +0100 (CET) Received: by svr2.hagander.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 53487DCC16D; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 15:28:24 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 15:28:24 +0100 From: Magnus Hagander To: "Marc G. Fournier" Cc: Greg Sabino Mullane , pgsql-www@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Problems with pgsql-announce Message-ID: <20070112142824.GA6561@svr2.hagander.net> References: <45A2A297.3030702@hagander.net> <2832647D5175723299FCAF1C@ganymede.hub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2832647D5175723299FCAF1C@ganymede.hub.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200701/51 X-Sequence-Number: 11318 > >>Which reminds me - I saw several emails pop through today after spending > >> 48 hours in the Maia Mailguard. Does that one actually help noticably > > for list traffic, or just for mailboxes? Because it certainly happens > > often that it slows down or stops list traffic completely.. > > 'k, nothing shoudl be spending >48 hours in the Maia Mailguard ... all it is is > amavisd on steroids ... it only quarantines email marked as spam (>5) and I go > through it periodically to make sure un-quarantine emails to help train the > bayes filters ... most of what gets 'falsely stuck' tend to be > subscribe/unsubscribe requests though ... if you see one that has been > 'spending 48 hours', please forward it to me with full headers, as something > else is wrong ... I've definitly seen that happen and more than once. DOn't have one around, but I'll eb sure to collect the headers next time it happens. //Magnus