Received: from localhost (maia-2.hub.org [200.46.204.187]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B0069FB442 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 11:19:08 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.187]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 13899-06 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 11:18:53 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.4 Received: from svr2.hagander.net (svr2.hagander.net [88.198.128.226]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 819AB9FB395 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 11:18:59 -0400 (AST) Received: from svr2.hagander.net (svr2.hagander.net [88.198.128.226]) by svr2.hagander.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C947DCC16F; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 16:18:57 +0100 (CET) Received: by svr2.hagander.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 976ABDCC170; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 16:18:57 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 16:18:57 +0100 From: Magnus Hagander To: Tom Lane Cc: "Marc G. Fournier" , Greg Sabino Mullane , pgsql-www@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Problems with pgsql-announce Message-ID: <20070112151857.GB7442@svr2.hagander.net> References: <45A2A297.3030702@hagander.net> <2832647D5175723299FCAF1C@ganymede.hub.org> <20070112142824.GA6561@svr2.hagander.net> <6868.1168614531@sss.pgh.pa.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6868.1168614531@sss.pgh.pa.us> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200701/54 X-Sequence-Number: 11321 On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 10:08:51AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Magnus Hagander writes: > >> most of what gets 'falsely stuck' tend to be > >> subscribe/unsubscribe requests though ... if you see one that has been > >> 'spending 48 hours', please forward it to me with full headers, as something > >> else is wrong ... > > > I've definitly seen that happen and more than once. DOn't have one > > around, but I'll eb sure to collect the headers next time it happens. > > Something else I've noticed saveral times in the last week is getting a > delayed copy of something that already came through. These weren't the > usual newbie-sends-another-copy-after-subscribing deal because they came > from established subscribers. I didn't save copies but will next time. I'm glad it's not just me. I've noticed this a couple of times, but didn't have time to investigate at the time either - I thought it might be my new MUA on the cellphone acting up ;-) //Magnus