From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Message-Id: <200701202302.l0KN2MG07226@momjian.us>
Subject: Re: Patch for text.css
In-Reply-To: <45B29BC7.3030606@hagander.net>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 18:02:22 -0500 (EST)
CC: Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>,
	pgsql-www@postgresql.org, perrym3@gmail.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"


I think the feedback was that using the standard colors was too likely
to look bad on the web site.  Perhaps you should just increase the
different between the blues on your version and commit it, and then ask
for more feedback.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Magnus Hagander wrote:
> I was hoping someone else would comment on which one of the two they
> preferred before we committed it. And then I promptly forgot about it ;-)
> 
> So, which one do people prefer?
> 
> //Magnus
> 
> 
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Are we going to apply this?
> > 
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > 
> > Magnus Hagander wrote:
> >> Robert Treat wrote:
> >>> On Monday 08 January 2007 11:20, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> >>>> On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 08:53:30PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> >>>>> Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
> >>>>>> Or should we perhaps just stop setting a color at all on it? That would
> >>>>>> let the browser choose color?
> >>>>> I wouldn't vote for that; the odds are good that the browser's defaults
> >>>>> would look ugly, or maybe even be nearly invisible against our
> >>>>> backgrounds.  We *should* set the link colors ... just not to the same
> >>>>> thing.
> >>>> I've applied the patch to http://magnus-master.pgadmin.org with the
> >>>> color as suggested, for review.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thoughts? Different color? Suggestions?
> >>>>
> >>> I had a hard time differentiating it last night, so I changed it to use the 
> >>> standard color on http://xzilla.postgresql.org just to get a different look. 
> >>> Anyone interested in comparing can check it out. 
> >> I personally think yours is clearer, but I'm a bit concerned on the
> >> third opinion ;-) Anybody else care to chime in?
> >>
> >> //Magnus
> >>
> >> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> >> TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
> >>        choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
> >>        match
> > 

-- 
  Bruce Momjian   bruce@momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB    http://www.enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +