Received: from localhost (maia-3.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27A579FB1F9; Sun, 21 Jan 2007 17:34:03 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 78534-09; Sun, 21 Jan 2007 17:33:57 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.4 X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.4 Received: from noel.decibel.org (noel.decibel.org [67.100.216.10]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 323FF9FB1F5; Sun, 21 Jan 2007 17:34:00 -0400 (AST) Received: by noel.decibel.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id C9C0E56453; Sun, 21 Jan 2007 15:33:56 -0600 (CST) Received: (hashcash-sendmail, from uid 1001); Sun, 21 Jan 2007 15:33:54 -0600 Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 15:33:54 -0600 From: "Jim C. Nasby" To: Dave Page Cc: pgsql-www@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Who reads the owner addresses? Message-ID: <20070121213354.GP77382@nasby.net> References: <200701192200070000@2310614804> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200701192200070000@2310614804> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE-p10 amd64 X-Distributed: Join the Effort! http://www.distributed.net User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-Hashcash: 1:20:070121:dpage@postgresql.org::l9G2V25hj43nyuNA:00000000000000000 000000000000000000000000AIN8 X-Hashcash: 1:20:070121:pgsql-www@postgresql.org::fa0PuVMOrkPf1nAt:0000000000000 0000000000000000000000001uMV X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200701/78 X-Sequence-Number: 11345 On Fri, Jan 19, 2007 at 10:00:07PM -0000, Dave Page wrote: > > ------- Original Message ------- > > From: "Jim C. Nasby" > > To: pgsql-www@postgresql.org > > Sent: 1/19/07, 9:45:22 PM > > Subject: [pgsql-www] Who reads the owner addresses? > > > > Something recently got screwed up with my list subscription. I tried > > emailing -owner for several lists (as the bounce email I got said) and > > never heard back. > > > > Who's responsible for those addresses? If we're not going to monitor > > them then the email that's sent out should be changed. > > I was gonna reply to one (to -www, a week or so ago iirc), but someone beat me to it by replying to a copy you sent to the list itself. That's all I saw though. Unfortunately I never saw that... :( It's probably worth replying anyway if someone's having a problem with their subscription. -- Jim Nasby jim@nasby.net EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell)