Received: from localhost (maia-5.hub.org [200.46.204.182]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB62D9FB1C3 for ; Thu, 1 Feb 2007 19:39:25 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.182]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 12538-03 for ; Thu, 1 Feb 2007 19:39:08 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.4 Received: from svr2.hagander.net (svr2.hagander.net [88.198.128.226]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A3D39FA2BB for ; Thu, 1 Feb 2007 19:39:12 -0400 (AST) Received: from svr2.hagander.net (svr2.hagander.net [88.198.128.226]) by svr2.hagander.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79DA5DCC392; Fri, 2 Feb 2007 00:39:10 +0100 (CET) Received: by svr2.hagander.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 72CA2DCC395; Fri, 2 Feb 2007 00:39:10 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2007 00:39:10 +0100 From: Magnus Hagander To: Tom Lane Cc: Greg Sabino Mullane , pgsql-www@postgresql.org Subject: Re: No checksums please Message-ID: <20070201233910.GD18987@svr2.hagander.net> References: <49801c0120f49f45c373f3888ba7d42e@biglumber.com> <23074.1170359084@sss.pgh.pa.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <23074.1170359084@sss.pgh.pa.us> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200702/5 X-Sequence-Number: 11410 On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 02:44:44PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > "Greg Sabino Mullane" writes: > > Could we please turn off all the checksum stuff for the mailing lists? > > Are you talking about disabling the detection of duplicate messages? > That seems like a seriously bad idea. I personally see a number of my > own messages regurgitated every so often by various people's broken > Microsloth-hatched excuses for MTAs, and I would not like to see those > dups dumped into the mailing list again (for one thing, it only takes > a small amount more MTA breakage to turn that into a self-feeding flood). I don't know if there is a difference between "duplicate detection" and "partial duplicate detection". AFAIK, only the "partial duplicate detection" has caused problems. But just ignore that ocmment if they are the same thing. //Magnus