Received: from localhost (maia-4.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E03D29FA50C for ; Mon, 5 Feb 2007 16:22:32 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 29300-05 for ; Mon, 5 Feb 2007 16:22:29 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.4 Received: from davinci.ethosmedia.com (server227.ethosmedia.com [209.128.84.227]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4F8A9FB2F1 for ; Mon, 5 Feb 2007 16:22:29 -0400 (AST) X-EthosMedia-Virus-Scanned: no infections found Received: from [64.81.245.111] (account josh@agliodbs.com HELO [192.168.1.27]) by davinci.ethosmedia.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8) with ESMTP-TLS id 11353935 for pgsql-www@postgresql.org; Mon, 05 Feb 2007 12:26:24 -0800 From: Josh Berkus Reply-To: josh@agliodbs.com Organization: Aglio Database Solutions To: pgsql-www@postgresql.org Subject: Request from training vendor re: home page Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2007 12:25:25 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200702051225.25922.josh@agliodbs.com> X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200702/35 X-Sequence-Number: 11440 WWW, You may or may not have noticed that we're getting a bit of jockeying for home page spots among our training vendors. It's obviously not in our interest to have different vendors manipulating the details of their events announcements, or even posting duplicates, in order to "control" what appears on the home page. One of the vendors involved had this suggestion: > Just a thought...I notice that now "training" is split out separately on > the PostgreSQL.org web site...which is great in the sense that > non-training events don't get pushed off the front page by training > events (or event spam...). > > I'm wondering if its possible to "somewhat equalize" things by > preventing a single vendor event from appearing more than once on the > front page. The idea being that training vendors (which are generally > for-profit) would get equal opportunity for that ever-important > front-page exposure... Seems like a decent idea; does it make sense to other people? How would we enforce it? -- --Josh Josh Berkus PostgreSQL @ Sun San Francisco