public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Josh Berkus <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Cc: Andrew Sullivan <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: How to coordinate web team for security releases?
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2007 14:06:28 -0800
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
Andrew,
> OTOH, reducing the number of addresses to include in these
> co-ordinations (since packagers presumably need to be alerted too)
> mightn't be a bad idea.
yeah, I'm thinking two (and only two) lists:
pgsql-packagers: for actual release building
press-contacts: for release FAQ.
I know the second adds more people, but I'm realizing that it's important
that our Regional Contacts know about the releases before they go out.
Otherwise we risk a press person actually calling, say, Nick about a
release and having him say "what security issue?" Also, the RCs are a
good way to dissemenate important update information to our
non-English-language communities.
The question is which is more appropriate for the web folks? I'm thinking
-packagers, because the web folks need to know when the actual packages
will be ready and any delays.
--
--Josh
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL @ Sun
San Francisco
view thread (50+ messages) latest in thread
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: How to coordinate web team for security releases?
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox