Received: from localhost (maia-4.hub.org [200.46.204.183])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66C879FAA6E;
	Thu,  8 Feb 2007 04:56:20 -0400 (AST)
Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 93417-01; Thu,  8 Feb 2007 04:56:15 -0400 (AST)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.4
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.4
Received: from svr2.hagander.net (svr2.hagander.net [88.198.128.226])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5517C9FA30D;
	Thu,  8 Feb 2007 04:56:15 -0400 (AST)
Received: from svr2.hagander.net (svr2.hagander.net [88.198.128.226])
	by svr2.hagander.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8BEEDCC3EA;
	Thu,  8 Feb 2007 09:56:13 +0100 (CET)
Received: by svr2.hagander.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id E18CADCC3EB; Thu,  8 Feb 2007 09:56:13 +0100 (CET)
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 09:56:13 +0100
From: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
To: "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
Cc: Dave Page <dpage@postgresql.org>, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>,
	PostgreSQL www <pgsql-www@postgresql.org>,
	"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>
Subject: Re: Another request ignored
Message-ID: <20070208085613.GD27377@svr2.hagander.net>
References: <200702071831.l17IVpX27461@momjian.us>
	<45CA3D86.100@postgresql.org> <45CA6C7E.6030703@commandprompt.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <45CA6C7E.6030703@commandprompt.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1
X-Archive-Number: 200702/152
X-Sequence-Number: 11557

On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 04:19:10PM -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Dave Page wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >> Why am I having to ask multiple times to get anything fixed lately?
> > 
> > Probably because you are asking the web team to fix a mailing list
> > issue.  I would suggest CC'ing Marc to ensure he reads it rather than
> > relying on him not missing it amongst the web stuff (which I believe he
> > tends to skim).
> > 
> > Regards, Dave.
> 
> Shouldn't this really be a sysadmins list type deal anyway?

Certainly not. The sysadmins list deals with *server maintenance*.

That said, I don't know if there is a list to deal with the list stuff -
not sure if anybody even reads majordomo-owner?

//Magnus