Received: from localhost (maia-1.hub.org [200.46.204.191]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09E3F9FB2D4 for ; Sun, 11 Feb 2007 12:45:37 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.191]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 90847-09 for ; Sun, 11 Feb 2007 12:45:30 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.4 Received: from vms042pub.verizon.net (vms042pub.verizon.net [206.46.252.42]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC8CF9FA49E for ; Sun, 11 Feb 2007 12:45:29 -0400 (AST) Received: from [192.168.2.8] ([69.205.165.248]) by vms042.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 (built Apr 3 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0JDB00FV457ITQ7F@vms042.mailsrvcs.net> for pgsql-www@postgresql.org; Sun, 11 Feb 2007 10:45:18 -0600 (CST) Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2007 11:45:15 -0500 From: Robert Treat Subject: Re: Multi-language to be or not to be In-reply-to: <45CF18A1.1090903@hagander.net> To: pgsql-www@postgresql.org Cc: Magnus Hagander Message-id: <200702111145.16253.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Content-disposition: inline References: <45CF18A1.1090903@hagander.net> User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200702/165 X-Sequence-Number: 11570 On Sunday 11 February 2007 08:22, Magnus Hagander wrote: > I'm working on a rewrite and major cleanup of parts of the code that > runs the main website, and came across a thought. > > We currently have support for translation of news, events, surveys, > quotes and pages. So far, we have zero news, zero events, zero surveys, > zero quotes and zero pages translated. > > The only translated pages are the press information ones, and I don't > count them because we don't actually use the translation infrastructure > for them - we link specifically to each and every page. > > All the other translations live on completely separate sites - I think > because they only translate parts of the information and also provide a > lot of native information in that language. > > I know adding translation capabilities was one of the big requirements > for the last rewrite. But I'd still like to bring up the question - > should we bother keeping it, or just get rid of it? We thought we had a > need then, but do we still have it? > > Getting rid of it will significantly simplify some code, and it will > make the static mirrors about half the size they are now (we currently > mirror every page both in English and in language-neutral (which means > English again)). > See recent post on advocacy from italian community asking about providing translation capabilities. We need to talk to them and see if we have something that they want to use; if we don't then I have no objections to removing it (though fwiw I don't find it a terrible burden as it currently stands) -- Robert Treat Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL