Received: from localhost (maia-1.hub.org [200.46.204.191]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAA7D9FB250 for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2007 04:45:49 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.191]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 82696-03 for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2007 04:45:46 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.4 Received: from svr2.hagander.net (svr2.hagander.net [88.198.128.226]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9649C9FA34A for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2007 04:45:46 -0400 (AST) Received: from svr2.hagander.net (svr2.hagander.net [88.198.128.226]) by svr2.hagander.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88F3DDCC468; Mon, 12 Feb 2007 09:45:44 +0100 (CET) Received: by svr2.hagander.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 81CA9DCC50A; Mon, 12 Feb 2007 09:45:44 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 09:45:44 +0100 From: Magnus Hagander To: Jaime Casanova Cc: "Joshua D. Drake" , "Marc G. Fournier" , Peter Eisentraut , pgsql-www@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Multi-language to be or not to be Message-ID: <20070212084544.GB4432@svr2.hagander.net> References: <45CF18A1.1090903@hagander.net> <200702112155.59395.peter_e@gmx.net> <45CF8847.3010703@commandprompt.com> <200702112246.31320.peter_e@gmx.net> <45CFB5D1.5070104@commandprompt.com> <45CFECD1.80406@commandprompt.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.12 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200702/178 X-Sequence-Number: 11583 On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 12:11:02AM -0500, Jaime Casanova wrote: > On 2/11/07, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > >> Spanish is probably another high percentage language > > > >I would not disagree, *if* more of the international community was > >actually helping keep up with that infrastructure but that isn't why it > >is happening. They are creating their own infrastructure. > > > > well actually it was a discussion about that in the spanish list few > month ago... some were talking about creating a new page and the > concensus was to update what historically has been the spanish > postgres page (www.postgresql.cl) but maybe having a translate of the > *oficial* page is better idea... Just for the record, if the translators want it, I'm *not* suggesting we remove the translation infrastructure. But most people who've previously suggested it's important we keep it are people who would *not* be doing any of the translations themselves. And I think you've found the real question here - is it better to have a language/region-specific page, or is it better to translate the main one. I personally do not think it's much point to having *both*, but as for which one of the two is best I think that's best left to those actually doing it. //Magnus