Received: from localhost (maia-3.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16C2E9FB309 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 09:12:27 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 44111-02 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 09:12:19 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.4 Received: from svr2.hagander.net (svr2.hagander.net [88.198.128.226]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDADC9FB251 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 09:12:23 -0400 (AST) Received: from svr2.hagander.net (svr2.hagander.net [88.198.128.226]) by svr2.hagander.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04E7FDCC5ED; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 14:12:22 +0100 (CET) Received: by svr2.hagander.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id F1E5CDCC645; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 14:12:21 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 14:12:21 +0100 From: Magnus Hagander To: Bruce Momjian Cc: "Joshua D. Drake" , Josh Berkus , pgsql-www@postgresql.org, Robert Treat Subject: Re: update to main page for feature freeze Message-ID: <20070305131221.GA15772@svr2.hagander.net> References: <45E4B433.2000308@commandprompt.com> <200702272244.l1RMiuD19924@momjian.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200702272244.l1RMiuD19924@momjian.us> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.063 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL, BAYES_50 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200703/4 X-Sequence-Number: 11701 On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 05:44:56PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Joshua D. Drake wrote: > > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > Josh Berkus wrote: > > >> All, > > >> > > >> Seriously, what I would suggest is that we put timeline information > > >> on /developer/roadmap, which is the correct place for it: > > >> > > >> March 31, 2007 Feature Freeze > > >> May-June 2007 Beta begins > > >> August-October 2007 8.3 Released > > >> March 31, 2008 Feature freeze for 8.4 (tentative) > > > > > > It would be good if you matched the information in the developer's FAQ: > > > > I didn't even know it was there. I will be happy to adjust. > > Well, the fact you didn't know it was there indicates there is a > problem. Hopefully having it on the web site will fix that. Now that it is ont he website, may I humbly suggest that it is removed from the developer FAQ (possibly replaced with a reference to the website) so we don't risk ending up with two locations saying different things? //Magnus