Received: from localhost (maia-4.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37B879FB8AF for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 15:32:27 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 41792-01-8 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 15:32:16 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.4 Received: from vms040pub.verizon.net (vms040pub.verizon.net [206.46.252.40]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79B5B9FBAD0 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 15:31:05 -0400 (AST) Received: from new-host.home ([71.166.59.121]) by vms040.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 (built Apr 3 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0JEH00L9NY76Q3ID@vms040.mailsrvcs.net> for pgsql-www@postgresql.org; Tue, 06 Mar 2007 13:30:43 -0600 (CST) Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 14:30:16 -0500 From: Robert Treat Subject: Re: Second try for roadmap.html In-reply-to: <45ECC551.9090402@commandprompt.com> To: pgsql-www@postgresql.org Cc: "Joshua D. Drake" , Bruce Momjian , Magnus Hagander Message-id: <200703061430.16427.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Content-disposition: inline References: <200703060131.l261Vki26059@momjian.us> <45ECC551.9090402@commandprompt.com> User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200703/12 X-Sequence-Number: 11709 On Monday 05 March 2007 20:35, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > > Yep, I see that now. Please use only this: > > > >
  • March 1, 2007 - Initial community review of all major feature > > patches
  • April 1, 2007 - Feature freeze, all patches must be > > submitted for review and application
  • mid-May, 2007 - All patches > > applied, beta testing begins
  • July, 2007 - Release of 8.3.0
  • > > > > I am a little disturbed people feel free to make up dates with no > > discussion. > Quite frankly I'm a little upset that you would bandy about such statements so casually. If that was directed at me, may I politley suggest you sod off. > So there is no confusion, it is my understanding that this has always > been the plan. > So there is even less confusion, let people be aware that I copy/pasted those dates from the email that Joshua sent originally: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-www/2007-02/msg00278.php. In the thread that follows no one offers a specific corrected timeline and Tom even wieghs in with what would appear to be acceptence of the timeline Joshua presented. I've corrected the timeline in cvs and it will appear in the next site update, hopefully we can all move on... -- Robert Treat Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL